Study on field corrosion test and classification evaluation method of buried gas pipeline

Purpose With the gradual expansion of the national gas pipeline network, leakage accidents on buried gas pipelines caused by corrosion were increasingly frequent. However, there is still a lack of scientific and comprehensive evaluation methods for pipeline corrosion under complex environmental conditions. Design/methodology/approach By using methods such as field testing, laboratory experiments and machine learning, the authors analyzed the corrosion potential, macroscopic morphology, corrosion products and machine learning corrosion prediction. Based on these analyses, a corrosion grading model for various service environments was established, leading to the development of a comprehensive evaluation method for buried pipeline corrosion. Findings Based on field corrosion data from buried pipelines, the actual service environments of pipelines were categorized into four types: natural environments, steady-state DC environments, dynamic DC environments and cathodic protection environments. The key influencing parameters and corrosion prediction models for each environment were investigated, resulting in the development of a comprehensive evaluation method for buried pipeline corrosion. Originality/value Based on corrosion data from actual service pipelines, a corrosion grading model for four types of service environments was established, leading to the development of a comprehensive evaluation method for buried gas pipeline corrosion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/acmm-03-2025-3216
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on field corrosion test and classification evaluation method of buried gas pipeline

Sha Sha Wang, Sheming Jiang, Zhibiao Yin, Jianzhong Zhao et al.
1 citations
Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
0.71
article

Study on field corrosion test and classification evaluation method of buried gas pipeline

Sha Sha Wang, Sheming Jiang, Zhibiao Yin, Jianzhong Zhao, Yanxia Du, Kai Wang, Yujun Cao, Xiaohua Tian
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose With the gradual expansion of the national gas pipeline network, leakage accidents on buried gas pipelines caused by corrosion were increasingly frequent. However, there is still a lack of scientific and comprehensive evaluation methods for pipeline corrosion under complex environmental conditions. Design/methodology/approach By using methods such as field testing, laboratory experiments and machine learning, the authors analyzed the corrosion potential, macroscopic morphology, corrosion products and machine learning corrosion prediction. Based on these analyses, a corrosion grading model for various service environments was established, leading to the development of a comprehensive evaluation method for buried pipeline corrosion. Findings Based on field corrosion data from buried pipelines, the actual service environments of pipelines were categorized into four types: natural environments, steady-state DC environments, dynamic DC environments and cathodic protection environments. The key influencing parameters and corrosion prediction models for each environment were investigated, resulting in the development of a comprehensive evaluation method for buried pipeline corrosion. Originality/value Based on corrosion data from actual service pipelines, a corrosion grading model for four types of service environments was established, leading to the development of a comprehensive evaluation method for buried gas pipeline corrosion.

Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials
China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group (CN), Beijing VDJBio (China) (CN), Beijing Information Science & Technology University (CN), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.