Undesired corporate sustainability practices under imperfect ESG rating scheme

Purpose This study examines the undesired impacts of one of China's ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) rating schemes on corporate sustainability practices in China. We draw on stakeholder salience theory and impression management theory to investigate how Chinese firms navigate ESG demands. Design/methodology/approach Using data from Chinese listed firms between 2011 and 2019, the study applies the 2015 enactment of China's New Environmental Protection Law as an exogenous shock to examine the investor and public concern about ESG ratings on firms' sustainability strategies. Findings The study finds that Chinese firms often prioritize symbolic sustainability initiatives over substantive environmental actions to enhance their ESG scores. This behavior is further exacerbated by the Chinese institutional context, where low social trust and high corruption fuel managerial opportunism and greenwashing. Originality/value Our findings highlight the need to strengthen environmental regulation, establish robust ESG rating schemes, and improve social oversight mechanisms to ensure that corporate practices contribute to environmental and social goals, rather than simply being used for image management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting Literature
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jal-08-2025-0433
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Undesired corporate sustainability practices under imperfect ESG rating scheme

Longguang Yu, Rui Xue, Martina K. Linnenluecke, Jinfang Tian
Journal of Accounting Literature
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Undesired corporate sustainability practices under imperfect ESG rating scheme

Longguang Yu, Rui Xue, Martina K. Linnenluecke, Jinfang Tian
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the undesired impacts of one of China's ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) rating schemes on corporate sustainability practices in China. We draw on stakeholder salience theory and impression management theory to investigate how Chinese firms navigate ESG demands. Design/methodology/approach Using data from Chinese listed firms between 2011 and 2019, the study applies the 2015 enactment of China's New Environmental Protection Law as an exogenous shock to examine the investor and public concern about ESG ratings on firms' sustainability strategies. Findings The study finds that Chinese firms often prioritize symbolic sustainability initiatives over substantive environmental actions to enhance their ESG scores. This behavior is further exacerbated by the Chinese institutional context, where low social trust and high corruption fuel managerial opportunism and greenwashing. Originality/value Our findings highlight the need to strengthen environmental regulation, establish robust ESG rating schemes, and improve social oversight mechanisms to ensure that corporate practices contribute to environmental and social goals, rather than simply being used for image management.

Journal of Accounting LiteratureVol. 47(5)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Shandong University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.