A Case for Interrogating the Relationships of Patriarchy, Masculinity, and Whiteness to Structural Power in the History of Education

Abstract As a field, the history of education contains scant analyses of power, deprivation, or privilege from a white, patriarchal, or masculine viewpoint, a concerning limitation that obscures how power works to reinscribe, sustain, and proliferate itself. This claim reflects that to some degree, gender is racialized and race is gendered. To support this contention, I discuss the small body of history of education scholarship that has interrogated white, masculine, and/or patriarchal power, highlighting in particular the work of feminist scholars of Color. 1 I also underscore what we as a field might gain in analyzing masculine, patriarchal, and/or white power with the same fervor many pay to racially, ethnically, and sexually marginalized communities, pointing out some seminal works and figures that stand to be further enhanced by gendered or racial analysis. I end with questions that could inform research directions toward these ends.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History of Education Quarterly
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/heq.2025.10116
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Case for Interrogating the Relationships of Patriarchy, Masculinity, and Whiteness to Structural Power in the History of Education

ArCasia D. James‐Gallaway
History of Education Quarterly
Critical Race Theory in Education
article

A Case for Interrogating the Relationships of Patriarchy, Masculinity, and Whiteness to Structural Power in the History of Education

ArCasia D. James‐Gallaway
article en

Abstract

Abstract As a field, the history of education contains scant analyses of power, deprivation, or privilege from a white, patriarchal, or masculine viewpoint, a concerning limitation that obscures how power works to reinscribe, sustain, and proliferate itself. This claim reflects that to some degree, gender is racialized and race is gendered. To support this contention, I discuss the small body of history of education scholarship that has interrogated white, masculine, and/or patriarchal power, highlighting in particular the work of feminist scholars of Color. 1 I also underscore what we as a field might gain in analyzing masculine, patriarchal, and/or white power with the same fervor many pay to racially, ethnically, and sexually marginalized communities, pointing out some seminal works and figures that stand to be further enhanced by gendered or racial analysis. I end with questions that could inform research directions toward these ends.

History of Education QuarterlyVol. 66(1)
Mitchell Institute (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Critical Race Theory in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.