Quantum-like cognition and decision-making in the light of quantum measurement theory

We characterize the class of quantum measurements that matches the applications of quantum theory to cognition (and decision-making)-quantum-like modelling. Projective measurements describe the canonical measurements of the basic observables of quantum physics. However, the combinations of the basic cognitive effects, such as the question order and response replicability effects (RREs), cannot be described by projective measurements. We motivate the use of the special class of quantum measurements, namely, <i>sharp repeatable non-projective measurements</i>-[Formula: see text] This class is practically unused in quantum physics. Thus, physics and cognition explore different parts of quantum measurement theory. Quantum-like modelling is not the automatic borrowing of the quantum formalism. Exploring the class [Formula: see text] highlights the role of <i>non-commutativity of the state-update maps generated by measurement back action</i>. Thus, 'non-classicality' in quantum physics as well as quantum-like modelling for cognition is based on two different types of non-commutativity, of operators (observables) and instruments (state-update maps): <i>observable non-commutativity</i> versus <i>state-update-non-commutativity</i>. We speculate that distinguishing quantum-like properties of the cognitive effects is the expression of the latter, or possibly both.This article is part of the theme issue 'Quantum theory and topology in models of decision making (Part 1)'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0372
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantum-like cognition and decision-making in the light of quantum measurement theory

Masanao Ozawa, Miho Fuyama, Andrei Khrennikov
3 citations
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
3.74
article

Quantum-like cognition and decision-making in the light of quantum measurement theory

Masanao Ozawa, Miho Fuyama, Andrei Khrennikov
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We characterize the class of quantum measurements that matches the applications of quantum theory to cognition (and decision-making)-quantum-like modelling. Projective measurements describe the canonical measurements of the basic observables of quantum physics. However, the combinations of the basic cognitive effects, such as the question order and response replicability effects (RREs), cannot be described by projective measurements. We motivate the use of the special class of quantum measurements, namely, <i>sharp repeatable non-projective measurements</i>-[Formula: see text] This class is practically unused in quantum physics. Thus, physics and cognition explore different parts of quantum measurement theory. Quantum-like modelling is not the automatic borrowing of the quantum formalism. Exploring the class [Formula: see text] highlights the role of <i>non-commutativity of the state-update maps generated by measurement back action</i>. Thus, 'non-classicality' in quantum physics as well as quantum-like modelling for cognition is based on two different types of non-commutativity, of operators (observables) and instruments (state-update maps): <i>observable non-commutativity</i> versus <i>state-update-non-commutativity</i>. We speculate that distinguishing quantum-like properties of the cognitive effects is the expression of the latter, or possibly both.This article is part of the theme issue 'Quantum theory and topology in models of decision making (Part 1)'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 383(2309)
Ritsumeikan University (JP), Chubu University (JP), Linnaeus University (SE), Eiken Chemical (Japan) (JP), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA), Nagoya University (JP)
Chubu University, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, RIKEN
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
3.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.