From quantum cognition to conceptuality interpretation I: tracing the Brussels group’s intellectual journey

The <i>conceptuality interpretation</i> of quantum mechanics proposes that quantum entities have a conceptual nature, interacting with the material world through processes that are the physical counterpart of the meaning-based processes, which typically occur in human cognition. This interpretation emerged from the early developments in <i>quantum cognition</i>, a field that uses quantum mathematics to model human cognitive activity. It benefited from the specific approach taken by the <i>Brussels research group</i>, modelling concepts themselves as quantum entities and minds as measuring apparatus. The article sketches the essential steps of the intellectual journey, going from the first applications of quantum notions and formalisms to human cognition to the proposal of a potentially groundbreaking interpretation of quantum mechanics, offering profound explanations for major quantum phenomena. This was done by drawing numerous parallels with the human conceptual domain and suggesting the existence of a level of cognitive activity that would underlie our physical reality. This means that an increased cross-fertilization between the conceptuality interpretation and quantum cognition is to be expected in the future, both of which are synergistic in furthering our understanding of the nature of reality. This is the first part of a two-part article. In the second part, which can be read independently of the first, the successes of the interpretation will be described in a more systematic way, providing a brief overview of what has been achieved so far.This article is part of the theme issue 'Quantum theory and topology in models of decision making (Part 1)'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0382
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From quantum cognition to conceptuality interpretation I: tracing the Brussels group’s intellectual journey

Diederik Aerts, Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi, Sandro Sozzo
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
article

From quantum cognition to conceptuality interpretation I: tracing the Brussels group’s intellectual journey

Diederik Aerts, Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi, Sandro Sozzo
article en

Abstract

The <i>conceptuality interpretation</i> of quantum mechanics proposes that quantum entities have a conceptual nature, interacting with the material world through processes that are the physical counterpart of the meaning-based processes, which typically occur in human cognition. This interpretation emerged from the early developments in <i>quantum cognition</i>, a field that uses quantum mathematics to model human cognitive activity. It benefited from the specific approach taken by the <i>Brussels research group</i>, modelling concepts themselves as quantum entities and minds as measuring apparatus. The article sketches the essential steps of the intellectual journey, going from the first applications of quantum notions and formalisms to human cognition to the proposal of a potentially groundbreaking interpretation of quantum mechanics, offering profound explanations for major quantum phenomena. This was done by drawing numerous parallels with the human conceptual domain and suggesting the existence of a level of cognitive activity that would underlie our physical reality. This means that an increased cross-fertilization between the conceptuality interpretation and quantum cognition is to be expected in the future, both of which are synergistic in furthering our understanding of the nature of reality. This is the first part of a two-part article. In the second part, which can be read independently of the first, the successes of the interpretation will be described in a more systematic way, providing a brief overview of what has been achieved so far.This article is part of the theme issue 'Quantum theory and topology in models of decision making (Part 1)'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 383(2309)
University of Udine (IT), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From quantum cognition to conceptuality interpretation I: tracing the Brussels group’s intellectual journey — Diederik Aerts, Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi, et al. · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS