Unleashing the transformative power of deliberation with contextual citizens

In this paper, we investigate deliberation procedures that invite citizens with contextual opinions to explore alternative thinking frames. Contextuality is captured in a simple quantum cognitive model. We show how disagreeing citizens endowed with contextual opinions can reach consensus in a binary collective decision problem with no improvement in their information. A necessary condition is that they are willing to (mentally) experience their fellow citizens' way of thinking. The diversity of thinking frames is what makes it possible to overcome initial disagreement. Consensus does not emerge spontaneously from deliberations: it requires facilitation.This article is part of the theme issue 'Quantum theory and topology in models of decision making (Part 1)'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0377
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unleashing the transformative power of deliberation with contextual citizens

Ariane Lambert‐Mogiliansky, Irénée Frérot
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
article

Unleashing the transformative power of deliberation with contextual citizens

Ariane Lambert‐Mogiliansky, Irénée Frérot
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate deliberation procedures that invite citizens with contextual opinions to explore alternative thinking frames. Contextuality is captured in a simple quantum cognitive model. We show how disagreeing citizens endowed with contextual opinions can reach consensus in a binary collective decision problem with no improvement in their information. A necessary condition is that they are willing to (mentally) experience their fellow citizens' way of thinking. The diversity of thinking frames is what makes it possible to overcome initial disagreement. Consensus does not emerge spontaneously from deliberations: it requires facilitation.This article is part of the theme issue 'Quantum theory and topology in models of decision making (Part 1)'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 383(2309)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Laboratoire Kastler Brossel (FR), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Laboratoire de Chimie Théorique (FR), Paris School of Economics (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.