Combining geostructural and retrospective analyses for rockfall susceptibility zoning

Abstract Rockfall is one of the most common hazards in mountainous environments, threatening infrastructure, and lives. However, a factor limiting preliminary rockfall hazard mapping at the cliff scale is often the lack of knowledge of potential source areas. In the best case, rockfall sources are known from short-term observations (a few years) based on LiDAR, photographic, or monitoring surveys. The presence and characteristics of discontinuities within the rock mass can then be used to identify source areas with differing release susceptibilities. In this investigative study, we used two approaches to assess spatial patterns of rockfall activity along the Täschgufer cliff (Swiss Alps). In a first step, we combined tree-ring and trajectory analyses to estimate the probability that rockfalls occurring from a given pixel of the cliff reach the sampled trees. This retrospective analysis of past activity also quantifies a rockfall release frequency, homogeneously distributed among the pixels susceptible to affect the trees. In a second step, we applied a high-resolution geostructural analysis to classify the cliff pixels according to their level of fracturing and to highlight source areas potentially more prone to rockfall detachment. Both approaches agree upon the absence of clear compartmentalization and a uniform weathering over the cliff. These convergent results, in line with existing observations, confirm the robustness of our results. By contrast, we hypothesize that the retrospective analysis yields an overestimation of release frequencies resulting from site peculiarities, such as the absence of preferential propagation corridors or the considerable distance between the cliff and the upper edge of the forest. Despite these site-related limitations, the methodology developed here clearly evidences the complementarity of both approaches for rockfall source area susceptibility zonation: while the retrospective analysis allows the delineation of areas potentially threatening the sampled trees, the geostructural investigation identifies, amongst these source areas, the most susceptible to trigger rockfalls. In that sense, we believe that the methodology deployed here provides a robust overall assessment of rockfall activity which could be used to prioritize mitigation measures and applicable for hazard management strategies in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landslides
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02630-8
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining geostructural and retrospective analyses for rockfall susceptibility zoning

Alberto Muñoz-Torrero Manchado, Franck Bourrier, Markus Stoffel, Manon Farvacque et al.
Landslides
Landslides and related hazards
article

Combining geostructural and retrospective analyses for rockfall susceptibility zoning

Alberto Muñoz-Torrero Manchado, Franck Bourrier, Markus Stoffel, Manon Farvacque, Mattias I. Coullie, Christophe Corona
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rockfall is one of the most common hazards in mountainous environments, threatening infrastructure, and lives. However, a factor limiting preliminary rockfall hazard mapping at the cliff scale is often the lack of knowledge of potential source areas. In the best case, rockfall sources are known from short-term observations (a few years) based on LiDAR, photographic, or monitoring surveys. The presence and characteristics of discontinuities within the rock mass can then be used to identify source areas with differing release susceptibilities. In this investigative study, we used two approaches to assess spatial patterns of rockfall activity along the Täschgufer cliff (Swiss Alps). In a first step, we combined tree-ring and trajectory analyses to estimate the probability that rockfalls occurring from a given pixel of the cliff reach the sampled trees. This retrospective analysis of past activity also quantifies a rockfall release frequency, homogeneously distributed among the pixels susceptible to affect the trees. In a second step, we applied a high-resolution geostructural analysis to classify the cliff pixels according to their level of fracturing and to highlight source areas potentially more prone to rockfall detachment. Both approaches agree upon the absence of clear compartmentalization and a uniform weathering over the cliff. These convergent results, in line with existing observations, confirm the robustness of our results. By contrast, we hypothesize that the retrospective analysis yields an overestimation of release frequencies resulting from site peculiarities, such as the absence of preferential propagation corridors or the considerable distance between the cliff and the upper edge of the forest. Despite these site-related limitations, the methodology developed here clearly evidences the complementarity of both approaches for rockfall source area susceptibility zonation: while the retrospective analysis allows the delineation of areas potentially threatening the sampled trees, the geostructural investigation identifies, amongst these source areas, the most susceptible to trigger rockfalls. In that sense, we believe that the methodology deployed here provides a robust overall assessment of rockfall activity which could be used to prioritize mitigation measures and applicable for hazard management strategies in the future.

LandslidesVol. 23(2)
University of Geneva (CH), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Science et Ingénierie des Matériaux et Procédés (FR), Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Université de Genève, Université de Lausanne, U.S. Forest Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.