A Measurement Roadmap to Guide Implementation Practitioners in Selecting Implementation Measures

Strong measurement is critical for carrying out, monitoring, and evaluating implementation practice efforts. Accurate, reliable, and practical measures empower implementation teams to evaluate implementation outcomes and mechanisms of change. Poor measurement, however, is costly and impedes implementation practice. Despite substantial efforts to catalog and evaluate implementation measures, resources that guide the selection of measures are limited. As a result, practitioners still face challenges when identifying and selecting appropriate implementation measures. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a Measurement Roadmap, which offers a step-by-step guide and set of resources to help practitioners engage with the process of finding and evaluating measures for their implementation project. The Measurement Roadmap begins by detailing the importance of connecting measurement with implementation theories, models, and frameworks. Subsequently, recommendations for where and how to find measures are provided. The Measurement Roadmap provides practical explanations of psychometric properties and guides readers through a simple, three-step process for evaluating the face validity of a measure. Finally, the Measurement Roadmap provides guidance for navigating several possible paths that our team has traversed when identifying and selecting implementation measures: (1) finding an ideal measure, (2) finding a similar, but not perfectly aligned measure, (3) finding several measures that must be compared, and (4) finding no existing measures. We include a practitioner-focused handout of the Measurement Roadmap for quick reference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Implementation Research and Applications
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-025-00189-z
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Measurement Roadmap to Guide Implementation Practitioners in Selecting Implementation Measures

Bryan J. Weiner, Anne Littlewood, Elizabeth Cramer, Trisha Arnold et al.
Global Implementation Research and Applications
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

A Measurement Roadmap to Guide Implementation Practitioners in Selecting Implementation Measures

Bryan J. Weiner, Anne Littlewood, Elizabeth Cramer, Trisha Arnold, Cara M. Antonaccio, Linda E. Guzman, Emily Fu, Cintly Celis-de Hoyos, Ruben G. Martinez, Margaret E. Crane, Hannah E. Frank
article en

Abstract

Strong measurement is critical for carrying out, monitoring, and evaluating implementation practice efforts. Accurate, reliable, and practical measures empower implementation teams to evaluate implementation outcomes and mechanisms of change. Poor measurement, however, is costly and impedes implementation practice. Despite substantial efforts to catalog and evaluate implementation measures, resources that guide the selection of measures are limited. As a result, practitioners still face challenges when identifying and selecting appropriate implementation measures. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a Measurement Roadmap, which offers a step-by-step guide and set of resources to help practitioners engage with the process of finding and evaluating measures for their implementation project. The Measurement Roadmap begins by detailing the importance of connecting measurement with implementation theories, models, and frameworks. Subsequently, recommendations for where and how to find measures are provided. The Measurement Roadmap provides practical explanations of psychometric properties and guides readers through a simple, three-step process for evaluating the face validity of a measure. Finally, the Measurement Roadmap provides guidance for navigating several possible paths that our team has traversed when identifying and selecting implementation measures: (1) finding an ideal measure, (2) finding a similar, but not perfectly aligned measure, (3) finding several measures that must be compared, and (4) finding no existing measures. We include a practitioner-focused handout of the Measurement Roadmap for quick reference.

Global Implementation Research and Applications
Providence College (US), University of Washington (US), Brown University (US), Rhode Island Hospital (US), Seattle University (US)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.