Quantum AI in Speech Emotion Recognition

We evaluate a hybrid quantum-classical pipeline for speech emotion recognition (SER) on a custom Afrikaans corpus using MFCC-based spectral features with pitch and energy variants, explicitly comparing three quantum approaches-a variational quantum classifier (VQC), a quantum support vector machine (QSVM), and a Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA)-based classifier-against a CNN-LSTM (CLSTM) baseline. We detail the classical-to-quantum data encoding (angle embedding with bounded rotations and an explicit feature-to-qubit map) and report test accuracy, weighted precision, recall, and F1. Under ideal analytic simulation, the quantum models reach 41-43% test accuracy; under a realistic 1% NISQ noise model (100-1000 shots) this degrades to 34-40%, versus 73.9% for the CLSTM baseline. Despite the markedly lower empirical accuracy-expected in the NISQ era-we provide an end-to-end, noise-aware hybrid SER benchmark and discuss the asymptotic advantages of quantum subroutines (Chebyshev-based quantum singular value transformation, quantum walks, and block encoding) that become relevant only in the fault-tolerant regime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Entropy
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/e27121201
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantum AI in Speech Emotion Recognition

Michael Norval, Zenghui Wang
1 citations
Entropy
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
2.48
article

Quantum AI in Speech Emotion Recognition

Michael Norval, Zenghui Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We evaluate a hybrid quantum-classical pipeline for speech emotion recognition (SER) on a custom Afrikaans corpus using MFCC-based spectral features with pitch and energy variants, explicitly comparing three quantum approaches-a variational quantum classifier (VQC), a quantum support vector machine (QSVM), and a Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA)-based classifier-against a CNN-LSTM (CLSTM) baseline. We detail the classical-to-quantum data encoding (angle embedding with bounded rotations and an explicit feature-to-qubit map) and report test accuracy, weighted precision, recall, and F1. Under ideal analytic simulation, the quantum models reach 41-43% test accuracy; under a realistic 1% NISQ noise model (100-1000 shots) this degrades to 34-40%, versus 73.9% for the CLSTM baseline. Despite the markedly lower empirical accuracy-expected in the NISQ era-we provide an end-to-end, noise-aware hybrid SER benchmark and discuss the asymptotic advantages of quantum subroutines (Chebyshev-based quantum singular value transformation, quantum walks, and block encoding) that become relevant only in the fault-tolerant regime.

EntropyVol. 27(12)
University of South Africa (ZA)
National Research Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.