Pharmacokinetic Cross-Over Study of Pharmacy-Compounded Chenodeoxycholic Acid Capsules Compared to Authorized Capsules

<b>Purpose:</b> The Amsterdam UMC pharmacy has been compounding chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) capsules for Dutch cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis patients since 2018. However, limited data are available on the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of therapeutic CDCA formulations. <b>Methods:</b> An open-label, single-center, randomized, two-period, two-sequence, cross-over study was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of pharmacy-compounded CDCA capsules to that of the authorized CDCA product. <b>Results:</b> Both formulations reached peak plasma concentrations (t<sub>max</sub>) at approximately 1 h post-dose. The mean AUC<sub>(0-6h)</sub> values were 262.4 (±69.4) µmol∙min/L for the compounded capsules and 248.0 (±78.1) µmol∙min/L for the authorized capsules, with a 90% confidence interval (CI) for the AUC<sub>(0-6h)</sub> ratio of 0.89-1.30, exceeding the accepted bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25. The mean C<sub>max</sub> for the compounded formulation (2.96 ± 0.91 µmol/L) was significantly lower than that of the comparator product (4.42 ± 1.36 µmol/L; <i>p</i> = 0.0040), with a 90% CI for the C<sub>max</sub> ratio of 0.57-0.80, also outside the bioequivalence range. <b>Conclusions:</b> Overall, the pharmacy-compounded and authorized capsules demonstrate a comparable AUC<sub>(0-6h)</sub> and t<sub>max</sub>. Bioequivalence could not be demonstrated, primarily due to high variation, a significantly lower C<sub>max</sub>, and an AUC<sub>(0-6h)</sub> ratio outside the accepted limits. These findings indicate that the compounded formulation results in reduced systemic peak exposure compared with the authorized product. However, given the high variation, a larger sample size would be needed to further investigate bioequivalence in future studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutics
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17121525
Primary Topic
Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacokinetic Cross-Over Study of Pharmacy-Compounded Chenodeoxycholic Acid Capsules Compared to Authorized Capsules

Frédéric M. Vaz, Carla E. M. Hollak, Natalja Bouwhuis, Bart Jacobs et al.
Pharmaceutics
Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
article

Pharmacokinetic Cross-Over Study of Pharmacy-Compounded Chenodeoxycholic Acid Capsules Compared to Authorized Capsules

Frédéric M. Vaz, Carla E. M. Hollak, Natalja Bouwhuis, Bart Jacobs, Eleonora L. Swart, Soumia Majait, E. Marleen Kemper
article en

Abstract

<b>Purpose:</b> The Amsterdam UMC pharmacy has been compounding chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) capsules for Dutch cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis patients since 2018. However, limited data are available on the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of therapeutic CDCA formulations. <b>Methods:</b> An open-label, single-center, randomized, two-period, two-sequence, cross-over study was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of pharmacy-compounded CDCA capsules to that of the authorized CDCA product. <b>Results:</b> Both formulations reached peak plasma concentrations (t<sub>max</sub>) at approximately 1 h post-dose. The mean AUC<sub>(0-6h)</sub> values were 262.4 (±69.4) µmol∙min/L for the compounded capsules and 248.0 (±78.1) µmol∙min/L for the authorized capsules, with a 90% confidence interval (CI) for the AUC<sub>(0-6h)</sub> ratio of 0.89-1.30, exceeding the accepted bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25. The mean C<sub>max</sub> for the compounded formulation (2.96 ± 0.91 µmol/L) was significantly lower than that of the comparator product (4.42 ± 1.36 µmol/L; <i>p</i> = 0.0040), with a 90% CI for the C<sub>max</sub> ratio of 0.57-0.80, also outside the bioequivalence range. <b>Conclusions:</b> Overall, the pharmacy-compounded and authorized capsules demonstrate a comparable AUC<sub>(0-6h)</sub> and t<sub>max</sub>. Bioequivalence could not be demonstrated, primarily due to high variation, a significantly lower C<sub>max</sub>, and an AUC<sub>(0-6h)</sub> ratio outside the accepted limits. These findings indicate that the compounded formulation results in reduced systemic peak exposure compared with the authorized product. However, given the high variation, a larger sample size would be needed to further investigate bioequivalence in future studies.

PharmaceuticsVol. 17(12)
Emma Kinderziekenhuis (NL), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.