Proposing a Tripartite Evaluation System of Musical Creativity in the Educational Context: Integrating Cognitive, Personality, and Environmental Dimensions

Musical creativity is an enigmatic and significant topic of enduring interest, but its evaluation remains a challenging and underexplored area. Grounded in the context of compulsory education in China and the requirements of the latest version of China’s National Standard for Arts Curriculum 2022, this study discusses how to evaluate musical creativity with reference to the three theories developed by Webster, Williams, and Burnard. The paper moves on to construct an Evaluation Index System of Musical Creativity (hereafter EISMC) with reference to the Delphi method, and fixes its weightings using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). After three rounds of consultation with professionals working in the field, it was determined that EISMC should have three primary indices: creative musical thinking , creative musical personality , and creative musical environment . Nine secondary indices were represented by divergent thinking , and 27 third-level indices were represented by flexibility . These indices reflect the multifaceted concerns of evaluators surrounding the daily evaluation of musical creativity. This bridges the gulf between theory and practice and provides a theoretical foundation, a replicable design paradigm, and practical suggestions for the effective evaluation of musical creativity both in China and abroad, which facilitates an enhancement of the evaluation of musical creativity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Music Education
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614251393863
Primary Topic
Diverse Music Education Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proposing a Tripartite Evaluation System of Musical Creativity in the Educational Context: Integrating Cognitive, Personality, and Environmental Dimensions

Zongguo Zhang, Yue Luo, Hang Su
International Journal of Music Education
Diverse Music Education Insights
article

Proposing a Tripartite Evaluation System of Musical Creativity in the Educational Context: Integrating Cognitive, Personality, and Environmental Dimensions

Zongguo Zhang, Yue Luo, Hang Su
article en

Abstract

Musical creativity is an enigmatic and significant topic of enduring interest, but its evaluation remains a challenging and underexplored area. Grounded in the context of compulsory education in China and the requirements of the latest version of China’s National Standard for Arts Curriculum 2022, this study discusses how to evaluate musical creativity with reference to the three theories developed by Webster, Williams, and Burnard. The paper moves on to construct an Evaluation Index System of Musical Creativity (hereafter EISMC) with reference to the Delphi method, and fixes its weightings using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). After three rounds of consultation with professionals working in the field, it was determined that EISMC should have three primary indices: creative musical thinking , creative musical personality , and creative musical environment . Nine secondary indices were represented by divergent thinking , and 27 third-level indices were represented by flexibility . These indices reflect the multifaceted concerns of evaluators surrounding the daily evaluation of musical creativity. This bridges the gulf between theory and practice and provides a theoretical foundation, a replicable design paradigm, and practical suggestions for the effective evaluation of musical creativity both in China and abroad, which facilitates an enhancement of the evaluation of musical creativity.

International Journal of Music Education
China Conservatory (CN), Education University of Hong Kong (HK), East China Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Diverse Music Education Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.