The Impact of Epidural Analgesia on the Dynamics of Labor and Perinatal Outcomes in Nulliparous Women: A Prospective Cohort Study

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Epidural analgesia remains the gold standard for intrapartum pain relief; however, its influence on labor dynamics and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women continues to be debated. This prospective cohort study aimed to investigate the effects of epidural analgesia on labor progression and neonatal outcomes among women experiencing spontaneous term labor. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> A total of 100 nulliparous women with singleton, cephalic pregnancies at 37-41 weeks of gestation were prospectively enrolled. Participants self-selected into either the epidural analgesia group (n = 50) or the no epidural analgesia group (n = 50) after standardized counseling on pain management options. Demographic data, labor characteristics, and neonatal outcomes, including the durations of the active and second stages of labor, the use of episiotomy or instrumental delivery, and the 1- and 5-min Apgar scores, were recorded and compared between groups. Group comparisons showed statistically significant differences when <i>p</i> values were below 0.05. <i>Results:</i> The active phase of labor was significantly longer in women receiving epidural analgesia compared with those without it, showing an approximately 60-min difference with a <i>p</i> value less than 0.001. The second stage was also modestly prolonged in the epidural group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Although the episiotomy rate was higher among women with epidural analgesia, there were no significant differences in perineal tears or instrumental delivery. Neonatal outcomes were comparable between groups, with similar 1- and 5-min Apgar scores. <i>Conclusions:</i> Epidural analgesia modestly prolongs the active and second stages of labor in nulliparous women but does not adversely affect neonatal well-being. These findings support the continued use of epidural analgesia as a safe and effective option for labor pain management, providing substantial maternal comfort without compromising neonatal outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61122109
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Epidural Analgesia on the Dynamics of Labor and Perinatal Outcomes in Nulliparous Women: A Prospective Cohort Study

Esra Andıç, Sedat Akgöl, Gül Çavuşoğlu, İhsan Bağlı et al.
Medicina
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

The Impact of Epidural Analgesia on the Dynamics of Labor and Perinatal Outcomes in Nulliparous Women: A Prospective Cohort Study

Esra Andıç, Sedat Akgöl, Gül Çavuşoğlu, İhsan Bağlı, Beda Büşra Özalp Çolak, Pınar Birol, Mesut Ali Halisçelik, Okan Andıç, Kevser Arkan, Ali Deniz Erkmen
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Epidural analgesia remains the gold standard for intrapartum pain relief; however, its influence on labor dynamics and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women continues to be debated. This prospective cohort study aimed to investigate the effects of epidural analgesia on labor progression and neonatal outcomes among women experiencing spontaneous term labor. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> A total of 100 nulliparous women with singleton, cephalic pregnancies at 37-41 weeks of gestation were prospectively enrolled. Participants self-selected into either the epidural analgesia group (n = 50) or the no epidural analgesia group (n = 50) after standardized counseling on pain management options. Demographic data, labor characteristics, and neonatal outcomes, including the durations of the active and second stages of labor, the use of episiotomy or instrumental delivery, and the 1- and 5-min Apgar scores, were recorded and compared between groups. Group comparisons showed statistically significant differences when <i>p</i> values were below 0.05. <i>Results:</i> The active phase of labor was significantly longer in women receiving epidural analgesia compared with those without it, showing an approximately 60-min difference with a <i>p</i> value less than 0.001. The second stage was also modestly prolonged in the epidural group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Although the episiotomy rate was higher among women with epidural analgesia, there were no significant differences in perineal tears or instrumental delivery. Neonatal outcomes were comparable between groups, with similar 1- and 5-min Apgar scores. <i>Conclusions:</i> Epidural analgesia modestly prolongs the active and second stages of labor in nulliparous women but does not adversely affect neonatal well-being. These findings support the continued use of epidural analgesia as a safe and effective option for labor pain management, providing substantial maternal comfort without compromising neonatal outcomes.

MedicinaVol. 61(12)
Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi (TR), Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.