Introduction

PRIVACY PROTECTION has become an increasingly complex and controversial issue, fuelling academic and policy discussions, particularly in relation to new technological advancements. On one hand, there are concerns arising from new technologies becoming the “Big Brother” who is “watching you,” to borrow George Orwell’s iconic phrase from his dystopian novel 1984 — a true panopticon, a modern system of power infringing upon individual liberty, autonomy, and dignity. Concerns also arise from the blurring of boundaries between work life and private life, a phenomenon closely associated with these technologies, which encroach on individuals’ private spheres. On the other hand, some argue that in the internet age, privacy as a right is no longer justified — or at least has become too powerful — claiming that privacy experts should not set policy that extends beyond their expertise into broader domains of technology regulation (Goldman, 2023), thereby limiting the potential of these technologies to do good.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60082/2819-2567.1063
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction

Einat Albin
Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

Introduction

Einat Albin
article en

Abstract

PRIVACY PROTECTION has become an increasingly complex and controversial issue, fuelling academic and policy discussions, particularly in relation to new technological advancements. On one hand, there are concerns arising from new technologies becoming the “Big Brother” who is “watching you,” to borrow George Orwell’s iconic phrase from his dystopian novel 1984 — a true panopticon, a modern system of power infringing upon individual liberty, autonomy, and dignity. Concerns also arise from the blurring of boundaries between work life and private life, a phenomenon closely associated with these technologies, which encroach on individuals’ private spheres. On the other hand, some argue that in the internet age, privacy as a right is no longer justified — or at least has become too powerful — claiming that privacy experts should not set policy that extends beyond their expertise into broader domains of technology regulation (Goldman, 2023), thereby limiting the potential of these technologies to do good.

Comparative Labor Law & Policy JournalVol. 45(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.