The afterlife of policies: unpacking post-termination pathways and the enduring influence of self-undermining feedbacks

Purpose This study investigates the long-term consequences of policy termination, focusing on the dismantling of state-funded crèches in the Czech Republic. It examines how terminated policies persist through political, institutional and normative policy legacies that shape subsequent reform efforts. Design/methodology/approach It develops a typology of policy “afterlives” – void, replacement and reintroduction – along with their possible sequential combinations. Drawing on document analysis and interviews, the article traces a thirty-year trajectory of termination, replacement and contested reintroduction in Czech childcare policy. Findings The analysis reveals three key barriers to policy reintroduction: institutional inertia generated by replacement policies; resistance from entrenched policy domains and haunting policy legacies – the residual dissatisfaction, mistrust and adverse sentiments stemming from the self-undermining feedback of terminated policies. These legacies persist over time, shaping stakeholder attitudes and institutional memory, thereby complicating reform and narrowing the space for policy imagination. Together, these factors resulted in a difficult process of reintroduction – a challenging “re-defamilialization” – which produced a fragmented and under-resourced system, reliant primarily on external EU funding. Practical implications Termination is shown to be a high-cost strategy in foundational welfare domains. It can erode institutional capacity, entrench replacement regimes and constrain future reform, underscoring the importance of adaptive reform over outright withdrawal. Originality/value The article advances policy termination research by theorizing termination as the beginning of policy afterlives rather than an endpoint. It offers a novel conceptual framework for analysing post-termination trajectories and demonstrates its value through a longitudinal case from Central Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-05-2025-0314
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The afterlife of policies: unpacking post-termination pathways and the enduring influence of self-undermining feedbacks

Martin Gurín
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

The afterlife of policies: unpacking post-termination pathways and the enduring influence of self-undermining feedbacks

Martin Gurín
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the long-term consequences of policy termination, focusing on the dismantling of state-funded crèches in the Czech Republic. It examines how terminated policies persist through political, institutional and normative policy legacies that shape subsequent reform efforts. Design/methodology/approach It develops a typology of policy “afterlives” – void, replacement and reintroduction – along with their possible sequential combinations. Drawing on document analysis and interviews, the article traces a thirty-year trajectory of termination, replacement and contested reintroduction in Czech childcare policy. Findings The analysis reveals three key barriers to policy reintroduction: institutional inertia generated by replacement policies; resistance from entrenched policy domains and haunting policy legacies – the residual dissatisfaction, mistrust and adverse sentiments stemming from the self-undermining feedback of terminated policies. These legacies persist over time, shaping stakeholder attitudes and institutional memory, thereby complicating reform and narrowing the space for policy imagination. Together, these factors resulted in a difficult process of reintroduction – a challenging “re-defamilialization” – which produced a fragmented and under-resourced system, reliant primarily on external EU funding. Practical implications Termination is shown to be a high-cost strategy in foundational welfare domains. It can erode institutional capacity, entrench replacement regimes and constrain future reform, underscoring the importance of adaptive reform over outright withdrawal. Originality/value The article advances policy termination research by theorizing termination as the beginning of policy afterlives rather than an endpoint. It offers a novel conceptual framework for analysing post-termination trajectories and demonstrates its value through a longitudinal case from Central Europe.

International Journal of Sociology and Social PolicyVol. 45(13-14)
University of Bremen (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The afterlife of policies: unpacking post-termination pathways and the enduring influence of self-undermining feedbacks — Martin Gurín · International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS