Is calling the SAF-RSF conflict a ‘dirty war’ an objective description or a moral judgment? A critical analysis of the ongoing war in Sudan (2023–present)

This paper critically examines the ongoing conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which began on 15 April 2023, and continues to date. It focuses on widespread and general violence against civilians, including forced displacement, destruction educational and healthcare systems, and massacres based on identity, rape and acts of sexual exploitation. Through qualitative examination of secondary sources like international and local news reports, human rights records, and conflict statistics on war crimes and attacks against civilians, the study questions the use of the term "dirty war" in the definition of the conflict. The research hypothesis raised in the middle asks if the declaration of the SAF-RSF conflict as a "dirty war" is an objective classification based on trends of war crimes and attacks on civilians or a moral description determined by political and discursive frameworks. By exploring the language, motivations, and narratives of war, the paper analyzes how war has been involved in influencing internal public opinion, international response, and historical record. The research contributes to further discussion of war talk humanitarian law, and the protection of civilians in contemporary internal armed conflicts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Social Sciences
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2586199
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is calling the SAF-RSF conflict a ‘dirty war’ an objective description or a moral judgment? A critical analysis of the ongoing war in Sudan (2023–present)

Mohd. Elmagzoub Eltahir, Asma Ahmed, Ayman Abdelkareem, Alaa AlRawashdeh et al.
Cogent Social Sciences
Gender, Security, and Conflict
article

Is calling the SAF-RSF conflict a ‘dirty war’ an objective description or a moral judgment? A critical analysis of the ongoing war in Sudan (2023–present)

Mohd. Elmagzoub Eltahir, Asma Ahmed, Ayman Abdelkareem, Alaa AlRawashdeh, Osman Sirajeldeen Ahmed
article en

Abstract

This paper critically examines the ongoing conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which began on 15 April 2023, and continues to date. It focuses on widespread and general violence against civilians, including forced displacement, destruction educational and healthcare systems, and massacres based on identity, rape and acts of sexual exploitation. Through qualitative examination of secondary sources like international and local news reports, human rights records, and conflict statistics on war crimes and attacks against civilians, the study questions the use of the term "dirty war" in the definition of the conflict. The research hypothesis raised in the middle asks if the declaration of the SAF-RSF conflict as a "dirty war" is an objective classification based on trends of war crimes and attacks on civilians or a moral description determined by political and discursive frameworks. By exploring the language, motivations, and narratives of war, the paper analyzes how war has been involved in influencing internal public opinion, international response, and historical record. The research contributes to further discussion of war talk humanitarian law, and the protection of civilians in contemporary internal armed conflicts.

Cogent Social SciencesVol. 11(1)
Fujita Health University (JP), Ajman University (AE), Kalinga University (IN), University of Sharjah (AE), Fuji University (JP), University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma (US), American University of Ras Al Khaimah (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.