Development of AI ethics guidelines model based on AI life cycle

Abstract The increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) requires the development of robust ethical frameworks to address emerging ethical challenges. Existing AI ethical guidelines are predominantly abstract and lack actionable requirements for practical implementation. This study addresses this gap by structuring AI ethics guidelines according to the AI life cycle, thereby identifying specific ethical requirements for each stage. AI ethics guidelines from seven leading countries were compared using a refined six-stage AI life cycle model. The analysis demonstrates that all seven countries emphasize the Model Development and Monitor & Evaluate Performance stages, while significant gaps persist in ethical guidance for other stages. Based on these findings, this study proposes a standardized AI ethics framework aligned with the AI life cycle, translating abstract ethical principles into concrete, actionable requirements and establishing a normative basis for ethical accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00851-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of AI ethics guidelines model based on AI life cycle

N Lee
1 citations
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Development of AI ethics guidelines model based on AI life cycle

N Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) requires the development of robust ethical frameworks to address emerging ethical challenges. Existing AI ethical guidelines are predominantly abstract and lack actionable requirements for practical implementation. This study addresses this gap by structuring AI ethics guidelines according to the AI life cycle, thereby identifying specific ethical requirements for each stage. AI ethics guidelines from seven leading countries were compared using a refined six-stage AI life cycle model. The analysis demonstrates that all seven countries emphasize the Model Development and Monitor & Evaluate Performance stages, while significant gaps persist in ethical guidance for other stages. Based on these findings, this study proposes a standardized AI ethics framework aligned with the AI life cycle, translating abstract ethical principles into concrete, actionable requirements and establishing a normative basis for ethical accountability.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(1)
Seoul National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development of AI ethics guidelines model based on AI life cycle — N Lee · AI and Ethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS