Knowledge backgrounds and additive manufacturing: moderating effects on part identification approaches and supply chain outcomes

This study investigates how knowledge backgrounds influence part identification in additive manufacturing (AM) decision-making. We examine the interplay between design- and supply chain-oriented expertise in shaping whether firms pursue AM-based redesign or 1:1 substitution. Using a multiple-case study approach, we conducted workshops in two defence-related organisations and one workshop beyond the defence sector, analysing how diverse knowledge backgrounds impact decision outcomes. The findings suggest that while diverse expertise fosters creative potential, effective facilitation is necessary to manage conflicting priorities. We introduce a structured decision framework to support AM part identification by balancing design feasibility and supply chain constraints. This study contributes to knowledge management (KM) in AM by demonstrating how absorptive capacity influences decision-making in AM adoption, with implications for organisations integrating AM into their supply chains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Production Research
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2025.2584722
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge backgrounds and additive manufacturing: moderating effects on part identification approaches and supply chain outcomes

Iñigo Flores Ituarte, Peder Veng Søberg, Jeppe Foshammer
International Journal of Production Research
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Knowledge backgrounds and additive manufacturing: moderating effects on part identification approaches and supply chain outcomes

Iñigo Flores Ituarte, Peder Veng Søberg, Jeppe Foshammer
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how knowledge backgrounds influence part identification in additive manufacturing (AM) decision-making. We examine the interplay between design- and supply chain-oriented expertise in shaping whether firms pursue AM-based redesign or 1:1 substitution. Using a multiple-case study approach, we conducted workshops in two defence-related organisations and one workshop beyond the defence sector, analysing how diverse knowledge backgrounds impact decision outcomes. The findings suggest that while diverse expertise fosters creative potential, effective facilitation is necessary to manage conflicting priorities. We introduce a structured decision framework to support AM part identification by balancing design feasibility and supply chain constraints. This study contributes to knowledge management (KM) in AM by demonstrating how absorptive capacity influences decision-making in AM adoption, with implications for organisations integrating AM into their supply chains.

International Journal of Production Research
Tampere University (FI), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Denmark Technical College (US), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.