Emotional Cues, Election Outcomes, and Intimate Partner Violence

Abstract This paper investigates the relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) and U.S. presidential election outcomes. Using elections from 2000 to 2016, this paper makes two contributions to the existing literature. First, it expands the emotional cue literature following Card and Dahl (Q J Econ 126:103–143, 2011) by examining a novel emotional trigger: election outcomes. Second, it provides an economic investigation of election stresses found in the psychology and political science literature. By interacting with the margin of victory for each state, I find large and significant decreases in IPV in states that vote for the winning candidate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eastern Economic Journal
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-025-00311-x
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotional Cues, Election Outcomes, and Intimate Partner Violence

Clay Collins
Eastern Economic Journal
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Emotional Cues, Election Outcomes, and Intimate Partner Violence

Clay Collins
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) and U.S. presidential election outcomes. Using elections from 2000 to 2016, this paper makes two contributions to the existing literature. First, it expands the emotional cue literature following Card and Dahl (Q J Econ 126:103–143, 2011) by examining a novel emotional trigger: election outcomes. Second, it provides an economic investigation of election stresses found in the psychology and political science literature. By interacting with the margin of victory for each state, I find large and significant decreases in IPV in states that vote for the winning candidate.

Eastern Economic JournalVol. 52(1)
University of Georgia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.