What shapes flood risk perceptions? Comparing public perceptions with FEMA flood hazard maps in the U.S.

Flooding remains one of the most damaging natural hazards, underscoring the need for a better understanding of public perceptions of flood risk to support preparedness and mitigation. This study compares risk perceptions from a national online survey of 918 respondents with FEMA flood maps. We define the risk perception gap as the difference between respondents' perceived flood risk and FEMA’s flood zone classifications, and we examine its drivers. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess how socioeconomic characteristics, spatial context, and latent variables from Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) influence whether individuals perceive their flood risk as higher, lower, accurate, or express uncertainty about it. Many residents living in FEMA-designated floodplains perceive their flood risk as lower. The results revealed that higher perceived self-efficacy was associated with either elevated perceived flood risk or increased uncertainty. Greater perceived susceptibility was correlated with less uncertainty. People who live near water bodies perceive flood risk differently from what FEMA maps indicate, reflecting polarized perceptions of flood risk. A lack of awareness about elevated terrain (necessary for avoiding rising flood waters) tends to downplay their flood risk. Older individuals exhibited less uncertainty about their property’s flood risk. These findings highlight the need for targeted, place-based flood-risk communication strategies that address socio-cognitive and geographical factors. These strategies may help to reduce perception gaps, improve community preparedness and risk literacy, and strengthen resilience to flooding. The potential underestimation of flood risk in FEMA flood maps highlights the need for improved map accuracy and localized risk assessments. • Many residents in FEMA flood zones have lower perceived flood risk or are uncertain about their flood risk. • 57% of respondents in high-risk zones downplay their flood risk in FEMA-designated flood zones. • Socioeconomic status, spatial context, and psychological variables shape flood risk perceptions. • Place-based, socio-cognitive strategies can reduce perception gaps and improve preparedness. • Potential underestimation in FEMA maps calls for improved accuracy and localized risk assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105941
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What shapes flood risk perceptions? Comparing public perceptions with FEMA flood hazard maps in the U.S.

Asim Zia, Masood Ali Khan, Christopher Koliba, Jessica A. Balerna et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
article

What shapes flood risk perceptions? Comparing public perceptions with FEMA flood hazard maps in the U.S.

Asim Zia, Masood Ali Khan, Christopher Koliba, Jessica A. Balerna, Trisha Shrum, Ruth Quainoo, Scott C. Merrill, Rodrigo Soares
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Flooding remains one of the most damaging natural hazards, underscoring the need for a better understanding of public perceptions of flood risk to support preparedness and mitigation. This study compares risk perceptions from a national online survey of 918 respondents with FEMA flood maps. We define the risk perception gap as the difference between respondents' perceived flood risk and FEMA’s flood zone classifications, and we examine its drivers. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess how socioeconomic characteristics, spatial context, and latent variables from Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) influence whether individuals perceive their flood risk as higher, lower, accurate, or express uncertainty about it. Many residents living in FEMA-designated floodplains perceive their flood risk as lower. The results revealed that higher perceived self-efficacy was associated with either elevated perceived flood risk or increased uncertainty. Greater perceived susceptibility was correlated with less uncertainty. People who live near water bodies perceive flood risk differently from what FEMA maps indicate, reflecting polarized perceptions of flood risk. A lack of awareness about elevated terrain (necessary for avoiding rising flood waters) tends to downplay their flood risk. Older individuals exhibited less uncertainty about their property’s flood risk. These findings highlight the need for targeted, place-based flood-risk communication strategies that address socio-cognitive and geographical factors. These strategies may help to reduce perception gaps, improve community preparedness and risk literacy, and strengthen resilience to flooding. The potential underestimation of flood risk in FEMA flood maps highlights the need for improved map accuracy and localized risk assessments. • Many residents in FEMA flood zones have lower perceived flood risk or are uncertain about their flood risk. • 57% of respondents in high-risk zones downplay their flood risk in FEMA-designated flood zones. • Socioeconomic status, spatial context, and psychological variables shape flood risk perceptions. • Place-based, socio-cognitive strategies can reduce perception gaps and improve preparedness. • Potential underestimation in FEMA maps calls for improved accuracy and localized risk assessments.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 132
University of Vermont (US), University of Kansas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.