Machine learning time-to-event algorithms for predicting the duration of ventilation after cardiac surgery

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Objective</h3> Prolonged mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery contributes significantly to morbidity, mortality, and excessive hospital resource use. Accurate prediction of prolonged mechanical ventilation duration can improve decision-making and patient outcomes. We aimed to develop and validate time-to-event models to predict the duration of ventilation and prolonged mechanical ventilation. <h3>Methods</h3> From the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III and IV databases, we extracted postoperative data from all cardiac surgery patients. We benchmarked 3 machine learning time-to-event algorithms (random survival forest, gradient boosted survival model, and survival support vector machine) against traditional Elastic-Net Cox regression. We evaluated model performance using weighted mean area under the curve (<mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>), cumulative/dynamic area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC<sup>C,D</sup>(<i>t</i>)), Concordance Index, and integrated Brier score. Permutation feature importance was reported for the best models. We conducted a sensitivity analysis to evaluate model fairness across different races and sexes. <h3>Results</h3> Models were trained on data from 10,430 cardiac surgery patients ventilated for a median of 7.0 hours (interquartile range, 4.4-16.0). Random survival forest had the highest <mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math> (0.834, 95% CI, 0.832-0.836) and integrated Brier score (0.041), whereas gradient boosted survival model had the highest Concordance Index (0.721, 95% CI, 0.717-0.724). All machine learning models significantly outperformed Elastic-Net Cox Regression. Ventilatory settings, laboratory results, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score within 4 hours of intubation were identified as the most important features. Sensitivity analysis showed equal or improved performance for minority female and non-White cohorts. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Machine learning time-to-event models for prolonged mechanical ventilation and the duration of ventilation, particularly random survival forest and gradient boosted survival model, have significantly improved performance compared with current state-of-the-art tools and may be valuable decision supports in the postoperative management of cardiac surgery patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JTCVS Open
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2025.11.021
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning time-to-event algorithms for predicting the duration of ventilation after cardiac surgery

Roshan Karri, Marcel Lucas Chee, Jahan C. Penny‐Dimri, Julian A. Smith et al.
JTCVS Open
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Machine learning time-to-event algorithms for predicting the duration of ventilation after cardiac surgery

Roshan Karri, Marcel Lucas Chee, Jahan C. Penny‐Dimri, Julian A. Smith, Luke A. Perry, Angou Gu
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Objective</h3> Prolonged mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery contributes significantly to morbidity, mortality, and excessive hospital resource use. Accurate prediction of prolonged mechanical ventilation duration can improve decision-making and patient outcomes. We aimed to develop and validate time-to-event models to predict the duration of ventilation and prolonged mechanical ventilation. <h3>Methods</h3> From the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III and IV databases, we extracted postoperative data from all cardiac surgery patients. We benchmarked 3 machine learning time-to-event algorithms (random survival forest, gradient boosted survival model, and survival support vector machine) against traditional Elastic-Net Cox regression. We evaluated model performance using weighted mean area under the curve (<mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>), cumulative/dynamic area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC<sup>C,D</sup>(<i>t</i>)), Concordance Index, and integrated Brier score. Permutation feature importance was reported for the best models. We conducted a sensitivity analysis to evaluate model fairness across different races and sexes. <h3>Results</h3> Models were trained on data from 10,430 cardiac surgery patients ventilated for a median of 7.0 hours (interquartile range, 4.4-16.0). Random survival forest had the highest <mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math> (0.834, 95% CI, 0.832-0.836) and integrated Brier score (0.041), whereas gradient boosted survival model had the highest Concordance Index (0.721, 95% CI, 0.717-0.724). All machine learning models significantly outperformed Elastic-Net Cox Regression. Ventilatory settings, laboratory results, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score within 4 hours of intubation were identified as the most important features. Sensitivity analysis showed equal or improved performance for minority female and non-White cohorts. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Machine learning time-to-event models for prolonged mechanical ventilation and the duration of ventilation, particularly random survival forest and gradient boosted survival model, have significantly improved performance compared with current state-of-the-art tools and may be valuable decision supports in the postoperative management of cardiac surgery patients.

JTCVS OpenVol. 29
Lincoln Medical Center (US), The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital (AU), Monash Health (AU), Australian Centre for Heart Health (AU), Melbourne Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Monash University
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.