Mobile cognitive remote assessment of schizophrenia: a global multi-site pilot study

Cognition in schizophrenia is difficult to assess in clinical settings due to the time required to administer traditional pen-and-paper tests, among other factors. Digital remote assessments completed on a smartphone offer an alternative that can reduce the burden on healthcare staff and patients, in addition to providing more nuanced cognitive profiles, especially when used in conjunction with smartphone data such as sleep. Building on previous work using the mindLAMP research app in international contexts, this paper presents a global multi-site pilot study to explore the validity of the app's digital cognitive assessments as proxies for traditional in-person assessments such as the gold standard MATRICS Consensus Battery (MCCB). Across one site in the U.S. (Boston) and two sites in India (Bangalore and Bhopal), a total of 56 participants with diagnoses of early-course schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were recruited between September 2024 and March 2025 to engage with the mindLAMP app for 30 days. Participants completed 2-3 different cognitive tasks and surveys each day; at the beginning and the end of this period, participants also took the MCCB and surveys related to their diagnosis. mindLAMP cognitive assessments were scored using different metrics that combine speed and accuracy, and correlation analyses were run on these metrics and MCCB domains. Of the scoring metrics used, the Rate-Correct Score (RCS) most consistently correlates with baseline MCCB domains corrected for age, gender, and education. Moderate test-retest reliability was observed across certain cognitive assessments such as a mobile version of Trails-Making Test A and Symbol Digit Substitution, which agrees with previous research done by Keefe et al.; poor test-retest reliability, in contrast, was observed across assessments such as Spatial Span. Additionally, we conducted exploratory mediation analyses using sleep data to see if sleep mediates between the Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) survey scores and performance on select digital cognitive assessments on mindLAMP. Our results support the initial accessibility, validity and reliability of using smartphones to assess cognition in schizophrenia. Future research to develop additional smartphone-based cognitive tests, as well as with larger samples and in other psychiatric populations, is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Schizophrenia
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-025-00660-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mobile cognitive remote assessment of schizophrenia: a global multi-site pilot study

Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta, Ritu Shrivastava, Anant Bhan, John A. Naslund et al.
2 citations
Schizophrenia
Digital Mental Health Interventions
3.09
article

Mobile cognitive remote assessment of schizophrenia: a global multi-site pilot study

Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta, Ritu Shrivastava, Anant Bhan, John A. Naslund, Nabagata Das, Preethi V. Reddy, John Blake Torous, Mehtab Ahmad, Tamonud Modak, Srilakshmi Nagendra, Jiaee Cheong, Soumya Choudhary, Yogendra Sen, Juan Castillo, Ameya Bondre, Abhijit R. Rozatkar, Deepak Tugnawat, Ajay Malviya, Erlend Lane, Ronak Chatterjee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Cognition in schizophrenia is difficult to assess in clinical settings due to the time required to administer traditional pen-and-paper tests, among other factors. Digital remote assessments completed on a smartphone offer an alternative that can reduce the burden on healthcare staff and patients, in addition to providing more nuanced cognitive profiles, especially when used in conjunction with smartphone data such as sleep. Building on previous work using the mindLAMP research app in international contexts, this paper presents a global multi-site pilot study to explore the validity of the app's digital cognitive assessments as proxies for traditional in-person assessments such as the gold standard MATRICS Consensus Battery (MCCB). Across one site in the U.S. (Boston) and two sites in India (Bangalore and Bhopal), a total of 56 participants with diagnoses of early-course schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were recruited between September 2024 and March 2025 to engage with the mindLAMP app for 30 days. Participants completed 2-3 different cognitive tasks and surveys each day; at the beginning and the end of this period, participants also took the MCCB and surveys related to their diagnosis. mindLAMP cognitive assessments were scored using different metrics that combine speed and accuracy, and correlation analyses were run on these metrics and MCCB domains. Of the scoring metrics used, the Rate-Correct Score (RCS) most consistently correlates with baseline MCCB domains corrected for age, gender, and education. Moderate test-retest reliability was observed across certain cognitive assessments such as a mobile version of Trails-Making Test A and Symbol Digit Substitution, which agrees with previous research done by Keefe et al.; poor test-retest reliability, in contrast, was observed across assessments such as Spatial Span. Additionally, we conducted exploratory mediation analyses using sleep data to see if sleep mediates between the Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) survey scores and performance on select digital cognitive assessments on mindLAMP. Our results support the initial accessibility, validity and reliability of using smartphones to assess cognition in schizophrenia. Future research to develop additional smartphone-based cognitive tests, as well as with larger samples and in other psychiatric populations, is warranted.

SchizophreniaVol. 11(1)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Madhya Pradesh Bhoj Open University (IN), Lemuel Shattuck Hospital (US), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal (IN), National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
Wellcome Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.