Advancing context-specific urban indicators for African cities: a systematic review

This study highlights the limitations of generic urban assessment frameworks in evaluating the sustainability of African cities and the Global South. It argues for the development of context-specific indicators that accurately reflect the unique socio-economic, cultural, spatial, and historical realities of these cities. While global frameworks offer useful benchmarks, their standardised methodologies often overlook the structural characteristics that define African cities, namely, informality, spatial and economic inequalities, governance constraints, and colonial urban legacies. To investigate why African cities frequently underperform when assessed using global urban sustainability indicators, we conducted a systematic literature review following the PRISMA framework. Our findings underscore the need to rethink assessment frameworks by expanding sustainability dimensions. We propose integrating underexplored yet critical sustainability dimensions and a novel ACTPL design conceptual framework to guide locally grounded sustainability metrics. This framework offers practical guidance for all urban stakeholders seeking to advance more inclusive and adaptive sustainable urban development strategies across the continent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Urban Sustainability
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-025-00292-y
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing context-specific urban indicators for African cities: a systematic review

Nara Monkam, Taiwo Afinowi
npj Urban Sustainability
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Advancing context-specific urban indicators for African cities: a systematic review

Nara Monkam, Taiwo Afinowi
article en

Abstract

This study highlights the limitations of generic urban assessment frameworks in evaluating the sustainability of African cities and the Global South. It argues for the development of context-specific indicators that accurately reflect the unique socio-economic, cultural, spatial, and historical realities of these cities. While global frameworks offer useful benchmarks, their standardised methodologies often overlook the structural characteristics that define African cities, namely, informality, spatial and economic inequalities, governance constraints, and colonial urban legacies. To investigate why African cities frequently underperform when assessed using global urban sustainability indicators, we conducted a systematic literature review following the PRISMA framework. Our findings underscore the need to rethink assessment frameworks by expanding sustainability dimensions. We propose integrating underexplored yet critical sustainability dimensions and a novel ACTPL design conceptual framework to guide locally grounded sustainability metrics. This framework offers practical guidance for all urban stakeholders seeking to advance more inclusive and adaptive sustainable urban development strategies across the continent.

npj Urban SustainabilityVol. 5(1)
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Advancing context-specific urban indicators for African cities: a systematic review — Nara Monkam, Taiwo Afinowi · npj Urban Sustainability (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS