Intervention using speech-to-text-technology for text production: a single-subject design study on students with mild intellectual disability

This study investigated the impact of a writing intervention that combined speech-to-text (STT) technology with explicit writing instruction for students with mild intellectual disability. Using a single-subject design, seven students aged 10-13 participated in a baseline phase involving independent keyboard writing, followed by an intervention phase that incorporated STT, teacher modeling, scaffolded checklist use, and individualized support focused on sentence construction, punctuation, and text coherence. Text production was evaluated through a comprehensive coding scheme assessing length, punctuation, coherence, and sentence completeness. The results revealed mixed outcomes. Some students showed notable improvements in text length, punctuation, and coherence, while others made limited progress. This variability highlights differences in responsiveness to STT among students with mild intellectual disability. Although STT can help reduce transcription barriers, its effectiveness may be further enhanced by integrating explicit instruction targeting broader writing skills. Future research should investigate how STT, combined with tailored writing interventions, can optimally support these students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2590917
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intervention using speech-to-text-technology for text production: a single-subject design study on students with mild intellectual disability

Heidi Selenius, Linda Fälth, Tobias Björklund
Cogent Education
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Intervention using speech-to-text-technology for text production: a single-subject design study on students with mild intellectual disability

Heidi Selenius, Linda Fälth, Tobias Björklund
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of a writing intervention that combined speech-to-text (STT) technology with explicit writing instruction for students with mild intellectual disability. Using a single-subject design, seven students aged 10-13 participated in a baseline phase involving independent keyboard writing, followed by an intervention phase that incorporated STT, teacher modeling, scaffolded checklist use, and individualized support focused on sentence construction, punctuation, and text coherence. Text production was evaluated through a comprehensive coding scheme assessing length, punctuation, coherence, and sentence completeness. The results revealed mixed outcomes. Some students showed notable improvements in text length, punctuation, and coherence, while others made limited progress. This variability highlights differences in responsiveness to STT among students with mild intellectual disability. Although STT can help reduce transcription barriers, its effectiveness may be further enhanced by integrating explicit instruction targeting broader writing skills. Future research should investigate how STT, combined with tailored writing interventions, can optimally support these students.

Cogent EducationVol. 12(1)
Stockholm University (SE), Linnaeus University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intervention using speech-to-text-technology for text production: a single-subject design study on students with mild intellectual disability — Heidi Selenius, Linda Fälth, et al. · Cogent Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS