Counterfactual Explanations via Locally-guided Sequential Algorithmic Recourse

Counterfactuals operationalised through algorithmic recourse have become a powerful tool to make artificial intelligence systems explainable. Conceptually, given an individual classified as \(y\) – the factual – we seek actions such that their prediction becomes the desired class \(y^{\prime}\) – the counterfactual. This process offers algorithmic recourse that is (1) easy to customise and interpret, and (2) directly aligned with the goals of each individual. However, the properties of a “good” counterfactual are still largely debated; it remains an open challenge to locate an effective counterfactual along with its corresponding recourse. Some strategies use gradient-driven methods, but these offer no guarantees on the feasibility of the recourse and are open to adversarial attacks on carefully created manifolds. This can lead to unfairness and lack of robustness. Other methods are data-driven, which mostly addresses the feasibility problem at the expense of privacy, security, and secrecy as they require access to the entire training data set. Here, we introduce a model-agnostic technique that composes feasible and actionable counterfactual explanations using locally-acquired information at each step of the algorithmic recourse. Our explainer preserves the privacy of users by only leveraging data that it specifically requires to construct actionable algorithmic recourse, and protects the model by offering transparency solely in the regions deemed necessary for the intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3770065
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counterfactual Explanations via Locally-guided Sequential Algorithmic Recourse

Chris McWilliams, Raúl Santos‐Rodríguez, Michael Ambler, Edward Small et al.
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Counterfactual Explanations via Locally-guided Sequential Algorithmic Recourse

Chris McWilliams, Raúl Santos‐Rodríguez, Michael Ambler, Edward Small, Jeffrey Chan, Kacper Sokol, Jeffrey N. Clark, Flora Dilys Salim
article en

Abstract

Counterfactuals operationalised through algorithmic recourse have become a powerful tool to make artificial intelligence systems explainable. Conceptually, given an individual classified as \(y\) – the factual – we seek actions such that their prediction becomes the desired class \(y^{\prime}\) – the counterfactual. This process offers algorithmic recourse that is (1) easy to customise and interpret, and (2) directly aligned with the goals of each individual. However, the properties of a “good” counterfactual are still largely debated; it remains an open challenge to locate an effective counterfactual along with its corresponding recourse. Some strategies use gradient-driven methods, but these offer no guarantees on the feasibility of the recourse and are open to adversarial attacks on carefully created manifolds. This can lead to unfairness and lack of robustness. Other methods are data-driven, which mostly addresses the feasibility problem at the expense of privacy, security, and secrecy as they require access to the entire training data set. Here, we introduce a model-agnostic technique that composes feasible and actionable counterfactual explanations using locally-acquired information at each step of the algorithmic recourse. Our explainer preserves the privacy of users by only leveraging data that it specifically requires to construct actionable algorithmic recourse, and protects the model by offering transparency solely in the regions deemed necessary for the intervention.

ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), ETH Zurich (CH), University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.