Replacement of cottonseed with an extruded flaxseed-based supplement alters milk fatty acid profile without affecting yield or methane emissions in Holstein dairy cows

Fats are considered effective in reducing enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions in ruminants, but limited research exists on the use of flaxseed fatty acids for this purpose in Holstein dairy cows. We evaluated the effects of an extruded flaxseed-based supplement that included a mix of flaxseed, peas, and alfalfa hay (LinPRO-R) on enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and milk quality. Holstein cows (n = 24, 113 ± 31 DIM) were arranged in a 3 × 3 Latin square design and assigned to one of the 3 treatments: control (CON), ration containing 4.5% LinPRO (4.5% LinPRO-R), or ration containing 9% LinPRO (9% LinPRO-R) on a DM basis. In the 9% LinPRO-R group, cottonseed was replaced with the flaxseed supplement; therefore, the fatty acid profile was altered, and the forage NDF increased with higher inclusion. However, the total fat content of different diets remained similar. After 2 wk of adaptation, each of the experimental periods lasted for 28 d. Milk yield and enteric emissions were captured daily. Weekly milk samples were analyzed for milk fat, protein, lactose, SNF, MUN, and SCC. All data were analyzed using a mixed model ANOVA in the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS (SAS Institute Inc.). Body weight change, DMI, and milk yield did not differ among the different LinPRO-R treatments. Milk fat percentage was lower in LinPRO-R supplemented cows compared with the CON group (CON: 4.67 ± 0.14%, 4.5% LinPRO-R: 4.47 ± 0.14%, and 9% LinPRO-R: 4.51 ± 0.14%), but milk protein, lactose, SNF, MUN, and SCC were unaffected. Methane and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions did not differ among treatments, whereas H<sub>2</sub> production was lower in CON than in 9% LinPRO-R (CON: 4.42 ± 0.14 g/d, 4.5% LinPRO-R: 4.66 ± 0.14 g/d, and 9% LinPRO-R: 4.88 ± 0.14 g/d). The percentage of cis-9 C18:1 in milk fat was higher in the 9% LinPRO-R group compared with the CON and 4.5% LinPRO-R groups. The percentage of C18:3n-3 was greater in LinPRO-R-supplemented cows (CON: 0.52 ± 0.03%, 4.5% LinPRO-R: 1.05 ± 0.03%, and 9% LinPRO-R: 1.46 ± 0.03%). Therefore, supplementation of Holstein cow diets with 4.5% and 9% LinPRO-R did not affect milk yield or enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, likely due to alterations in forage NDF content and the dietary fatty acid profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-26862
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Replacement of cottonseed with an extruded flaxseed-based supplement alters milk fatty acid profile without affecting yield or methane emissions in Holstein dairy cows

Selina C. Wang, Afroza Akter, E. Kebreab, X Li et al.
1 citations
Journal of Dairy Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
1.90
article

Replacement of cottonseed with an extruded flaxseed-based supplement alters milk fatty acid profile without affecting yield or methane emissions in Holstein dairy cows

Selina C. Wang, Afroza Akter, E. Kebreab, X Li, E Grey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Fats are considered effective in reducing enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions in ruminants, but limited research exists on the use of flaxseed fatty acids for this purpose in Holstein dairy cows. We evaluated the effects of an extruded flaxseed-based supplement that included a mix of flaxseed, peas, and alfalfa hay (LinPRO-R) on enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and milk quality. Holstein cows (n = 24, 113 ± 31 DIM) were arranged in a 3 × 3 Latin square design and assigned to one of the 3 treatments: control (CON), ration containing 4.5% LinPRO (4.5% LinPRO-R), or ration containing 9% LinPRO (9% LinPRO-R) on a DM basis. In the 9% LinPRO-R group, cottonseed was replaced with the flaxseed supplement; therefore, the fatty acid profile was altered, and the forage NDF increased with higher inclusion. However, the total fat content of different diets remained similar. After 2 wk of adaptation, each of the experimental periods lasted for 28 d. Milk yield and enteric emissions were captured daily. Weekly milk samples were analyzed for milk fat, protein, lactose, SNF, MUN, and SCC. All data were analyzed using a mixed model ANOVA in the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS (SAS Institute Inc.). Body weight change, DMI, and milk yield did not differ among the different LinPRO-R treatments. Milk fat percentage was lower in LinPRO-R supplemented cows compared with the CON group (CON: 4.67 ± 0.14%, 4.5% LinPRO-R: 4.47 ± 0.14%, and 9% LinPRO-R: 4.51 ± 0.14%), but milk protein, lactose, SNF, MUN, and SCC were unaffected. Methane and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions did not differ among treatments, whereas H<sub>2</sub> production was lower in CON than in 9% LinPRO-R (CON: 4.42 ± 0.14 g/d, 4.5% LinPRO-R: 4.66 ± 0.14 g/d, and 9% LinPRO-R: 4.88 ± 0.14 g/d). The percentage of cis-9 C18:1 in milk fat was higher in the 9% LinPRO-R group compared with the CON and 4.5% LinPRO-R groups. The percentage of C18:3n-3 was greater in LinPRO-R-supplemented cows (CON: 0.52 ± 0.03%, 4.5% LinPRO-R: 1.05 ± 0.03%, and 9% LinPRO-R: 1.46 ± 0.03%). Therefore, supplementation of Holstein cow diets with 4.5% and 9% LinPRO-R did not affect milk yield or enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, likely due to alterations in forage NDF content and the dietary fatty acid profile.

Journal of Dairy ScienceVol. 109(2)
University of California System (US), University of California, Davis (US)
California Dairy Research Foundation, University of California, Davis
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
1.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.