Aesthetic Integrity Index (AII) for human–AI hybrid epistemology: Reconfiguring the Beholder’s Share through Xie He’s Six Principles

• Establishes an evaluation framework for human–AI collaborative systems in the era of hybrid intelligence. • Introduces the Aesthetic Integrity Index (AII), a quantitative model that reconfigures the Beholder’s Share as an epistemic negotiation process by operationalizing Xie He’s Six Principles as cultural reasoning benchmarks. • Employs a non-compensatory additive–multiplicative structure integrating aesthetic fidelity (TASc = 0.6723), cultural anchoring (CAF = 0.0900), and calibrated agency (AAC = 1.0200), yielding an AII score of 77.75 that reflects balanced human–AI co-agency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100242
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aesthetic Integrity Index (AII) for human–AI hybrid epistemology: Reconfiguring the Beholder’s Share through Xie He’s Six Principles

Rin Chang
Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Aesthetic Integrity Index (AII) for human–AI hybrid epistemology: Reconfiguring the Beholder’s Share through Xie He’s Six Principles

Rin Chang
article en

Abstract

• Establishes an evaluation framework for human–AI collaborative systems in the era of hybrid intelligence. • Introduces the Aesthetic Integrity Index (AII), a quantitative model that reconfigures the Beholder’s Share as an epistemic negotiation process by operationalizing Xie He’s Six Principles as cultural reasoning benchmarks. • Employs a non-compensatory additive–multiplicative structure integrating aesthetic fidelity (TASc = 0.6723), cultural anchoring (CAF = 0.0900), and calibrated agency (AAC = 1.0200), yielding an AII score of 77.75 that reflects balanced human–AI co-agency.

Computers in Human Behavior Artificial HumansVol. 6
Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.