A review of the hydrogen production Technologies’ global warming Potential: From the perspective of system boundary

• Hydrogen production carbon emissions are reviewed from a system boundary perspective. • Quantifying the impact of carbon emission of different system boundary. • Proposing a uniform carbon accounting framework for hydrogen production technologies. • Boundary selection can reverse technology rankings in carbon emission evaluations. Hydrogen energy, with the significant decarbonization potential as the clean secondary energy source, is driving the development of diverse production technologies. Here, we comprehensively evaluate technological advancements and environmental impacts of conventional, low-carbon, and emerging hydrogen production technologies. The results indicate that renewable energy-driven water electrolysis offers great promise for low-carbon hydrogen production. In contrast, steam methane reforming coupled with carbon capture and storage, although reducing emissions to 1.0–3.6 kg CO 2 eq/kg H 2 , continues to face lifecycle limitations due to methane leakage and ongoing fossil fuel dependence. Further analysis reveals that feedstock selection, process optimization, and the transition of energy structures serve as critical levers for green hydrogen production. Through systematic cross-technology quantitative analysis, we demonstrate how system boundary selection critically influences global warming potential assessments across different production methods. To address the methodological inconsistencies in current life cycle assessment practices, this work proposes a tiered and modular unified accounting boundary framework that reconstructs hydrogen production technologies into three core modules: Energy Supply, production, and application & end-of-life. This approach provides both standardized comparison and flexible adaptation for various technologies, significantly enhancing the transparency, comparability and policy relevance of environmental assessments for the global hydrogen transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management X
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101429
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A review of the hydrogen production Technologies’ global warming Potential: From the perspective of system boundary

Zishen Li, Donggang Yao, Yuan Zhuang, Zhichun Li et al.
Energy Conversion and Management X
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
article

A review of the hydrogen production Technologies’ global warming Potential: From the perspective of system boundary

Zishen Li, Donggang Yao, Yuan Zhuang, Zhichun Li, Yirong Wu, Caifeng Shan
article en

Abstract

• Hydrogen production carbon emissions are reviewed from a system boundary perspective. • Quantifying the impact of carbon emission of different system boundary. • Proposing a uniform carbon accounting framework for hydrogen production technologies. • Boundary selection can reverse technology rankings in carbon emission evaluations. Hydrogen energy, with the significant decarbonization potential as the clean secondary energy source, is driving the development of diverse production technologies. Here, we comprehensively evaluate technological advancements and environmental impacts of conventional, low-carbon, and emerging hydrogen production technologies. The results indicate that renewable energy-driven water electrolysis offers great promise for low-carbon hydrogen production. In contrast, steam methane reforming coupled with carbon capture and storage, although reducing emissions to 1.0–3.6 kg CO 2 eq/kg H 2 , continues to face lifecycle limitations due to methane leakage and ongoing fossil fuel dependence. Further analysis reveals that feedstock selection, process optimization, and the transition of energy structures serve as critical levers for green hydrogen production. Through systematic cross-technology quantitative analysis, we demonstrate how system boundary selection critically influences global warming potential assessments across different production methods. To address the methodological inconsistencies in current life cycle assessment practices, this work proposes a tiered and modular unified accounting boundary framework that reconstructs hydrogen production technologies into three core modules: Energy Supply, production, and application & end-of-life. This approach provides both standardized comparison and flexible adaptation for various technologies, significantly enhancing the transparency, comparability and policy relevance of environmental assessments for the global hydrogen transition.

Energy Conversion and Management XVol. 29
Qilu University of Technology (CN), University of Jinan (CN), Qilu Normal University (CN), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN), Shandong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.