Phenolic and sensory profiles distinguish Malbec wines according to intra-vineyard soil effective depth across different vintages

High-elevation viticulture in Mendoza is increasingly recognised among the world’s top wine regions. This unique terroir combines heterogeneous alluvial soils, intense solar ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation and cool night temperatures, creating distinct phenotypic expressions of Vitis vinifera L., particularly Malbec, Argentina’s most important grapevine variety. This three-year study investigated intra-vineyard soil heterogeneity by evaluating the impact of contrasting soil profiles of shallow (SS) and deep (DS) soils on the qualitative and quantitative phenolic profiles, antioxidant capacity, and sensory attributes of Malbec wines. The experiment was carried out on a 1450 m a.s.l. vineyard selecting parcels with different effective soil depth (SS: 0–0.45 m; DS: 1–1.5 m) and physicochemical properties, but matching viticultural management and irrigation. Ripening occurred earlier in SS, and grapes were harvested at comparable °Brix across soil types; however, harvest °Brix varied by season. Winemaking was conducted in replicates using standardised procedures. Two-way ANOVA revealed significant main effects of soil type and vintage, plus their interaction. While vintage effects were significant, SS consistently produced wines with higher dihydroxylated and non-acylated anthocyanins, as well as greater antioxidant capacity (ORAC) and total anthocyanin content in two of the three vintages. Low-molecular-weight polyphenols (LMWPs) such as polydatin (a stilbene), astilbin (a dihydroflavonol), and quercetin (a flavonol) were significantly higher in SS wines, whereas p-coumaric acid (a hydroxycinnamic acid) and (–)-epicatechin (a flavanol) predominated in DS wines. Sensory analysis revealed that expert tasters consistently distinguished and preferred SS wines, which were perceived as more acidic and astringent. In contrast, DS wines were characterised by sweeter flavours and jam, green pepper, leather, and earthy notes. The perception of mineral aroma did not differ between soil types. These findings contribute to a better understanding of how soil profile influences Malbec wine composition and sensory descriptor expressions in a consistent manner, that is, under variable seasonal conditions, fundamental for terroir-driven wine production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OENO One
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2025.59.4.9460
Primary Topic
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phenolic and sensory profiles distinguish Malbec wines according to intra-vineyard soil effective depth across different vintages

Ariel Fontana, Patricia Píccoli, Roy Urvieta, Daniela Mezzatesta et al.
OENO One
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
article

Phenolic and sensory profiles distinguish Malbec wines according to intra-vineyard soil effective depth across different vintages

Ariel Fontana, Patricia Píccoli, Roy Urvieta, Daniela Mezzatesta, Fernando Buscema, Federico Berli, Aníbal A. Catania
article en

Abstract

High-elevation viticulture in Mendoza is increasingly recognised among the world’s top wine regions. This unique terroir combines heterogeneous alluvial soils, intense solar ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation and cool night temperatures, creating distinct phenotypic expressions of Vitis vinifera L., particularly Malbec, Argentina’s most important grapevine variety. This three-year study investigated intra-vineyard soil heterogeneity by evaluating the impact of contrasting soil profiles of shallow (SS) and deep (DS) soils on the qualitative and quantitative phenolic profiles, antioxidant capacity, and sensory attributes of Malbec wines. The experiment was carried out on a 1450 m a.s.l. vineyard selecting parcels with different effective soil depth (SS: 0–0.45 m; DS: 1–1.5 m) and physicochemical properties, but matching viticultural management and irrigation. Ripening occurred earlier in SS, and grapes were harvested at comparable °Brix across soil types; however, harvest °Brix varied by season. Winemaking was conducted in replicates using standardised procedures. Two-way ANOVA revealed significant main effects of soil type and vintage, plus their interaction. While vintage effects were significant, SS consistently produced wines with higher dihydroxylated and non-acylated anthocyanins, as well as greater antioxidant capacity (ORAC) and total anthocyanin content in two of the three vintages. Low-molecular-weight polyphenols (LMWPs) such as polydatin (a stilbene), astilbin (a dihydroflavonol), and quercetin (a flavonol) were significantly higher in SS wines, whereas p-coumaric acid (a hydroxycinnamic acid) and (–)-epicatechin (a flavanol) predominated in DS wines. Sensory analysis revealed that expert tasters consistently distinguished and preferred SS wines, which were perceived as more acidic and astringent. In contrast, DS wines were characterised by sweeter flavours and jam, green pepper, leather, and earthy notes. The perception of mineral aroma did not differ between soil types. These findings contribute to a better understanding of how soil profile influences Malbec wine composition and sensory descriptor expressions in a consistent manner, that is, under variable seasonal conditions, fundamental for terroir-driven wine production.

OENO OneVol. 59(4)
Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza (AR), National Agricultural Technology Institute (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.