Physical Activity Assessment—Self-Reported Versus Pedometer-Measured, and Associations with Health Markers Among University Students in South Africa

Accurate measurement of physical activity is crucial for promoting health and preventing non-communicable diseases, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, where the dual burden of infectious and chronic diseases presents significant public health challenges. While self-reported tools are commonly used, they are often limited by recall and social desirability biases. This study aimed to compare self-reported physical activity with objectively measured pedometer data and explore their associations with fitness and anthropometric indicators among university students. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 60 full-time students at a South African university. The study was conducted in two phases: For phase 1, participants completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). For phase two, participants wore pedometers for seven consecutive days to measure total and aerobic step counts. Fitness was assessed using the Harvard Step Test to calculate the Physical Efficiency Index (PEI), and anthropometric data (BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, body fat percentage) were recorded. Statistical analyses included Spearman's correlations, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and multivariable linear regression. While 83.3% of participants self-reported high physical activity levels, pedometer data indicated that 61.7% accumulated fewer than 1500 aerobic steps per day and 53.3% recorded fewer than 5000 total steps. No significant association was found between self-reported activity and pedometer-measured steps (<i>p</i>-value = 0.748 and <i>p</i>-value = 0.835, respectively). Objective measures showed significant positive correlations between aerobic steps and PEI (<i>r</i> = 0.274, <i>p</i>-value = 0.034) and significant negative correlations with BMI (<i>r</i> = -0.489, <i>p</i>-value < 0.001) and body fat percentage (<i>r</i> = -0.255, <i>p</i>-value = 0.046). Older age and female gender were associated with lower step counts. This study reveals a significant overestimation of physical activity in self-reports compared to objective measures and stronger links between objectively measured steps and key health outcomes. The findings highlight the need to integrate objective monitoring tools into public health practice and youth-focused interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa. They underscore the importance of exploring context-specific factors influencing activity levels. Enhancing measurement accuracy is vital for advancing evidence-based strategies and achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22121798
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical Activity Assessment—Self-Reported Versus Pedometer-Measured, and Associations with Health Markers Among University Students in South Africa

Francis Akpa-Inyang, Firoza Haffejee, Sizwe Vincent Mbona, Gareth Hewer et al.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Physical Activity and Health
article

Physical Activity Assessment—Self-Reported Versus Pedometer-Measured, and Associations with Health Markers Among University Students in South Africa

Francis Akpa-Inyang, Firoza Haffejee, Sizwe Vincent Mbona, Gareth Hewer, Julian David Pillay
article en

Abstract

Accurate measurement of physical activity is crucial for promoting health and preventing non-communicable diseases, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, where the dual burden of infectious and chronic diseases presents significant public health challenges. While self-reported tools are commonly used, they are often limited by recall and social desirability biases. This study aimed to compare self-reported physical activity with objectively measured pedometer data and explore their associations with fitness and anthropometric indicators among university students. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 60 full-time students at a South African university. The study was conducted in two phases: For phase 1, participants completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). For phase two, participants wore pedometers for seven consecutive days to measure total and aerobic step counts. Fitness was assessed using the Harvard Step Test to calculate the Physical Efficiency Index (PEI), and anthropometric data (BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, body fat percentage) were recorded. Statistical analyses included Spearman's correlations, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and multivariable linear regression. While 83.3% of participants self-reported high physical activity levels, pedometer data indicated that 61.7% accumulated fewer than 1500 aerobic steps per day and 53.3% recorded fewer than 5000 total steps. No significant association was found between self-reported activity and pedometer-measured steps (<i>p</i>-value = 0.748 and <i>p</i>-value = 0.835, respectively). Objective measures showed significant positive correlations between aerobic steps and PEI (<i>r</i> = 0.274, <i>p</i>-value = 0.034) and significant negative correlations with BMI (<i>r</i> = -0.489, <i>p</i>-value < 0.001) and body fat percentage (<i>r</i> = -0.255, <i>p</i>-value = 0.046). Older age and female gender were associated with lower step counts. This study reveals a significant overestimation of physical activity in self-reports compared to objective measures and stronger links between objectively measured steps and key health outcomes. The findings highlight the need to integrate objective monitoring tools into public health practice and youth-focused interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa. They underscore the importance of exploring context-specific factors influencing activity levels. Enhancing measurement accuracy is vital for advancing evidence-based strategies and achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 22(12)
Durban University of Technology (ZA)
Durban University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.