Reconsideration of IMO’s Maneuvering Performance Standards for Large Fishing Vessels
This study evaluates the applicability and limitations of the International Maritime Organization (IMO)’s maneuvering standards (MSC.137(76)) for large fishing vessels under 100 m in length, which are not currently included in the regulation. Full-scale turning circle, zig-zag, and stopping tests were conducted on three representative vessels—a stern trawler, a purse seiner, and a squid-jigging boat—in accordance with ISO 15016:2015 and ITTC procedures. All the vessels satisfied the IMO criteria for their turning and stopping performance; however, the zig-zag tests revealed distinct differences in directional stability. The stern trawler and purse seiner showed excessive first-overshoot angles, indicating over-reactive yaw responses influenced by the hull form and propulsion–rudder interaction, whereas the squid-jigging boat exhibited very small overshoot angles, reflecting strong yaw damping. These patterns correspond with variations in the block coefficient (Cb), Froude number (Fn), and length-to-breadth ratio LBP/B. Although all vessels met the IMO stopping requirements, their deceleration behavior differed due to their hull fullness and reverse-thrust efficiency. Overall, the findings clearly demonstrate a mismatch between merchant-vessel-based IMO standards and the maneuvering characteristics of fishing vessels, which require agility and frequent low-speed operations. The results provide a basis for refining maneuvering prediction methods and developing assessment criteria tailored to fishing vessel design and operational profiles.
Authors
- Min-Gyu Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7639-2666)
- Su-Hyung Kim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0987-2561)
Institutions
- Pukyong National University (KR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
- Published
- 2025-11-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13122256
- Primary Topic
- Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00