Repeated Resistance Training Reveals the Reproducibility of Muscle Strength and Size Responses Within Individuals

This study investigated whether the responses of upper and lower limb muscle strength and size to resistance training (RT) are reproducible across two RT periods. Untrained males and females (age 32 ± 5 years) were randomly assigned to RT (n = 20) or a control group (n = 27). The RT group completed two identical 10-week RT periods separated by 10 weeks of detraining. The control group underwent a 10-week non-RT period. Before and after each period, the muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) of the vastus lateralis (VL) and biceps brachii (BB) was measured by ultrasound. One-repetition maximum (1RM) was measured in leg press (LP) and biceps curl (BC). Minimal detectable changes were determined. The RT group showed greater gains (p < 0.001) in muscle size and strength than the control group, with variability observed among individual responses. The reproducibility of responses within-participants was demonstrated by correlations (p ≤ 0.001) between the first and second RT periods in VLCSA (r = 0.697), BBCSA (r = 0.761), and LP1RM (r = 0.671), with a trend for BC1RM (r = 0.393 and p = 0.095). Nonresponders were identified, but none were detected in both RT periods for more than one variable. First RT correlated negatively (p < 0.05) with subsequent detraining in BBCSA (r = -0.673) and LP1RM (r = -0.488), with a trend for VLCSA (r = -0.422 and p = 0.072). In conclusion, responses to RT are reproducible when RT is repeated, indicating that the individuality of the training response has a physiological origin. Nonresponsiveness is rare and should not be justified solely by one variable. Responses to detraining suggest that greater RT gains may also diminish faster.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Sport Science
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.70095
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repeated Resistance Training Reveals the Reproducibility of Muscle Strength and Size Responses Within Individuals

Juha P. Ahtiainen, Aapo Räntilä, Juha J. Hulmi, Sasu O. Kaasinen et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Sport Science
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
article

Repeated Resistance Training Reveals the Reproducibility of Muscle Strength and Size Responses Within Individuals

Juha P. Ahtiainen, Aapo Räntilä, Juha J. Hulmi, Sasu O. Kaasinen, Eeli J. Halonen, Esko J. Tiainen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigated whether the responses of upper and lower limb muscle strength and size to resistance training (RT) are reproducible across two RT periods. Untrained males and females (age 32 ± 5 years) were randomly assigned to RT (n = 20) or a control group (n = 27). The RT group completed two identical 10-week RT periods separated by 10 weeks of detraining. The control group underwent a 10-week non-RT period. Before and after each period, the muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) of the vastus lateralis (VL) and biceps brachii (BB) was measured by ultrasound. One-repetition maximum (1RM) was measured in leg press (LP) and biceps curl (BC). Minimal detectable changes were determined. The RT group showed greater gains (p < 0.001) in muscle size and strength than the control group, with variability observed among individual responses. The reproducibility of responses within-participants was demonstrated by correlations (p ≤ 0.001) between the first and second RT periods in VLCSA (r = 0.697), BBCSA (r = 0.761), and LP1RM (r = 0.671), with a trend for BC1RM (r = 0.393 and p = 0.095). Nonresponders were identified, but none were detected in both RT periods for more than one variable. First RT correlated negatively (p < 0.05) with subsequent detraining in BBCSA (r = -0.673) and LP1RM (r = -0.488), with a trend for VLCSA (r = -0.422 and p = 0.072). In conclusion, responses to RT are reproducible when RT is repeated, indicating that the individuality of the training response has a physiological origin. Nonresponsiveness is rare and should not be justified solely by one variable. Responses to detraining suggest that greater RT gains may also diminish faster.

European Journal of Sport ScienceVol. 25(12)
University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.