Sociodemographic Determinants of University Students’ Attitudes Toward Wheelchair Users: A Cross-Sectional Study in Nine Eastern European Countries

Public attitudes toward people with disabilities (PwD) shape inclusion, healthcare access, and social participation. Although attitudes have improved, stereotypes and implicit biases persist. Intergroup contact is linked to more positive attitudes, yet its frequency and quality vary. In Eastern Europe, the ongoing war in Ukraine may directly or indirectly influence disability-related attitudes, as mobility impairments increase and societal exposure to disability changes. We conducted a multi-country cross-sectional study of 8593 university students from nine Eastern European countries using the Multidimensional Attitudes Scale toward Persons with Disabilities (MAS). We assessed cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes, alongside sociodemographic factors and contact with wheelchair users. Nonparametric tests and Spearman’s ρ were used to examine between-country differences and correlates. Higher MAS scores indicate more negative attitudes. MAS global and subscale scores differed significantly across countries. More frequent and higher-quality contact with wheelchair users was associated with less negative attitudes, though effect sizes were generally small. Several sociodemographic variables (e.g., gender, place of upbringing, field of study, religiosity) showed significant, albeit modest, associations with MAS subscales. Cross-national variation was pronounced: global MAS means ranged from 74.3±18.2 (Ukraine) to 92.3±16.6 (Serbia), with a significant between-country effect (Kruskal–Wallis H = 650, p < 0.001). Cross-national differences in students’ attitudes toward wheelchair users are substantial and broadly consistent with intergroup contact theory. In conflict-affected settings (e.g., Ukraine), rising visibility of disability and shifting contact patterns may further influence attitudes. Interventions that foster meaningful, high-quality contact and inclusive practices in educational environments may help mitigate negative attitudes and promote social inclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-025-02650-7
Primary Topic
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sociodemographic Determinants of University Students’ Attitudes Toward Wheelchair Users: A Cross-Sectional Study in Nine Eastern European Countries

Mesiya Aydın, Jan Karczewski, Jozef Babečka, Andrea Pokorná et al.
Journal of Public Health
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
article

Sociodemographic Determinants of University Students’ Attitudes Toward Wheelchair Users: A Cross-Sectional Study in Nine Eastern European Countries

Mesiya Aydın, Jan Karczewski, Jozef Babečka, Andrea Pokorná, Liudmila Vilchynskaya, Andriej Szpakow, Jana Juříková, Yasemin Yalçın, Brigita Banjac, Rafał Modzelewski, Olga Fedortsiv, Radenko Matić, Ľubica Bánovčinová, Yelena Loginovich, Joanna Baj–Korpak, Krystyna Kowalczuk, Ivana Milovanović, Stevo Popović, Anna Knyszyńska, İlknur Aydın Avci, Lucia Demjanovič Kendrová, Milena Mitrović
article en

Abstract

Public attitudes toward people with disabilities (PwD) shape inclusion, healthcare access, and social participation. Although attitudes have improved, stereotypes and implicit biases persist. Intergroup contact is linked to more positive attitudes, yet its frequency and quality vary. In Eastern Europe, the ongoing war in Ukraine may directly or indirectly influence disability-related attitudes, as mobility impairments increase and societal exposure to disability changes. We conducted a multi-country cross-sectional study of 8593 university students from nine Eastern European countries using the Multidimensional Attitudes Scale toward Persons with Disabilities (MAS). We assessed cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes, alongside sociodemographic factors and contact with wheelchair users. Nonparametric tests and Spearman’s ρ were used to examine between-country differences and correlates. Higher MAS scores indicate more negative attitudes. MAS global and subscale scores differed significantly across countries. More frequent and higher-quality contact with wheelchair users was associated with less negative attitudes, though effect sizes were generally small. Several sociodemographic variables (e.g., gender, place of upbringing, field of study, religiosity) showed significant, albeit modest, associations with MAS subscales. Cross-national variation was pronounced: global MAS means ranged from 74.3±18.2 (Ukraine) to 92.3±16.6 (Serbia), with a significant between-country effect (Kruskal–Wallis H = 650, p < 0.001). Cross-national differences in students’ attitudes toward wheelchair users are substantial and broadly consistent with intergroup contact theory. In conflict-affected settings (e.g., Ukraine), rising visibility of disability and shifting contact patterns may further influence attitudes. Interventions that foster meaningful, high-quality contact and inclusive practices in educational environments may help mitigate negative attitudes and promote social inclusion.

Journal of Public Health
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT), Medical University of Białystok (PL), University of Novi Sad (RS), University of Prešov (SK), Masaryk University (CZ), Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR), Akademia Bialska im. Jana Pawła II (PL), Alanya University (TR), Akademia Łomżyńska (PL), Malopolska Association For Agricultural Extension At The Agricultural University of Cracow (PL), Department of Public Health (MM), I.Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University (UA), Catholic University in Ruzomberok (SK), University of Montenegro (ME), Comenius University Bratislava (SK), Pomeranian Medical University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.