UK Forecasts of Annual GDP: Their Accuracy and the Information Categories Underlying Their Revisions

ABSTRACT Policy makers are concerned with the accuracy of GDP forecasts and want to understand the reasons for the revision of forecasts. We study these issues by examining forecasts of annual UK GDP growth by a panel of agents, published monthly by HM Treasury. We focus on two main issues: the developing accuracy of the group‐mean forecast as horizons shorten and the identification of information categories underlying agents' forecast revisions. The accuracy of the group‐mean forecast is poor; there is evidence of information rigidity in forecasts within the target year, and accuracy only improves in May of the target year when contemporary information flows lead to increased accuracy. We find a pessimism bias; the median errors of group‐mean forecasts are increasingly positive for horizons shorter than 17 months. We seek to explain revisions to both long‐ and short‐horizon group‐mean forecasts and individual agent forecasts. Modeling individual agents' forecast revisions using a moving window, we note a consistent tendency by agents to revise their forecast towards the group‐mean. Although their importance varied over time, the main information categories explaining revisions were, over longer horizons, the cost of finance, production, and a business confidence indicator. FX rates and inflation were influential over shorter horizons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forecasting
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/for.70071
Primary Topic
German Economic Analysis & Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UK Forecasts of Annual GDP: Their Accuracy and the Information Categories Underlying Their Revisions

Ciarán Driver, Nigel Meade
Journal of Forecasting
German Economic Analysis & Policies
article

UK Forecasts of Annual GDP: Their Accuracy and the Information Categories Underlying Their Revisions

Ciarán Driver, Nigel Meade
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Policy makers are concerned with the accuracy of GDP forecasts and want to understand the reasons for the revision of forecasts. We study these issues by examining forecasts of annual UK GDP growth by a panel of agents, published monthly by HM Treasury. We focus on two main issues: the developing accuracy of the group‐mean forecast as horizons shorten and the identification of information categories underlying agents' forecast revisions. The accuracy of the group‐mean forecast is poor; there is evidence of information rigidity in forecasts within the target year, and accuracy only improves in May of the target year when contemporary information flows lead to increased accuracy. We find a pessimism bias; the median errors of group‐mean forecasts are increasingly positive for horizons shorter than 17 months. We seek to explain revisions to both long‐ and short‐horizon group‐mean forecasts and individual agent forecasts. Modeling individual agents' forecast revisions using a moving window, we note a consistent tendency by agents to revise their forecast towards the group‐mean. Although their importance varied over time, the main information categories explaining revisions were, over longer horizons, the cost of finance, production, and a business confidence indicator. FX rates and inflation were influential over shorter horizons.

Journal of ForecastingVol. 45(3)
University of London (GB), London School of Business and Finance (GB), SOAS University of London (GB), NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
German Economic Analysis & Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.