Response Inhibition in borderline personality disorder assessed with a gamified stop signal task

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by pervasive difficulties with self-image, interpersonal relationships, emotion regulation and impulse control. Impulsive behaviors can be assessed using tasks such as the stop-signal task (SST). Traditional SSTs are repetitive and cognitively demanding, requiring sustained attention and effort over extended periods. This can be challenging, particularly for clinical populations who often experience difficulties with attention, emotional regulation, and frustration tolerance. In this study, we examined whether a gamified version of the SST (gSST) could effectively differentiate inhibitory control in patients with BPD compared to healthy controls (HC), and explored associations between behavioral performance and self-reported impulsivity. Fifty participants (25 BPD, 25 HC) completed the gSST and the UPPS-P impulsivity questionnaire. Patients with BPD showed significantly faster reaction times, more choice errors, and shorter stop-signal delays, indicating impairments in proactive inhibition. Evidence for reactive inhibition deficits was, however, inconclusive, as no significant group difference emerged for the primary measure, the stop-signal reaction time (SSRT). The SSRT correlated positively with self-reported positive urgency across the sample, suggesting a link between emotionally driven impulsivity and inhibitory control as assessed with a gSST. These findings highlight the potential of gamified cognitive tasks to provide sensitive, engaging, and ecologically valid measures of impulsivity, with implications for both clinical assessment and personalized intervention strategies in BPD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30255-3
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response Inhibition in borderline personality disorder assessed with a gamified stop signal task

Maximilian A. Friehs, Martin Dechant, Jérôme Brunelin, Emmanuel Poulet et al.
Scientific Reports
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

Response Inhibition in borderline personality disorder assessed with a gamified stop signal task

Maximilian A. Friehs, Martin Dechant, Jérôme Brunelin, Emmanuel Poulet, Nadine Barakat, Lionel Cailhol, Cécilia Neige
article en

Abstract

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by pervasive difficulties with self-image, interpersonal relationships, emotion regulation and impulse control. Impulsive behaviors can be assessed using tasks such as the stop-signal task (SST). Traditional SSTs are repetitive and cognitively demanding, requiring sustained attention and effort over extended periods. This can be challenging, particularly for clinical populations who often experience difficulties with attention, emotional regulation, and frustration tolerance. In this study, we examined whether a gamified version of the SST (gSST) could effectively differentiate inhibitory control in patients with BPD compared to healthy controls (HC), and explored associations between behavioral performance and self-reported impulsivity. Fifty participants (25 BPD, 25 HC) completed the gSST and the UPPS-P impulsivity questionnaire. Patients with BPD showed significantly faster reaction times, more choice errors, and shorter stop-signal delays, indicating impairments in proactive inhibition. Evidence for reactive inhibition deficits was, however, inconclusive, as no significant group difference emerged for the primary measure, the stop-signal reaction time (SSRT). The SSRT correlated positively with self-reported positive urgency across the sample, suggesting a link between emotionally driven impulsivity and inhibitory control as assessed with a gSST. These findings highlight the potential of gamified cognitive tasks to provide sensitive, engaging, and ecologically valid measures of impulsivity, with implications for both clinical assessment and personalized intervention strategies in BPD.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), University College Dublin (IE), Department of Health and Social Care (GB), Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA), Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (FR), Hôpital Edouard Herriot (FR), Montreal Council on Foreign Relations (CA), Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier (FR), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (CA), University College London (GB), Université de Montréal (CA), University of Twente (NL)
Fondation Neurodis, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Université de Montréal, Fondation Pierre Deniker pour la Recherche et la Prévention en Santé Mentale
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.