Laboratory Modeling of the Archaeomagnetic Record in Thellier–Coe Experiments

Abstract—The influence of the magnitude of a laboratory magnetic field in the Thellier–Coe method on the results of determining the archaeointensity of the magnetic field was studied. The experiments were carried out on the same samples of artificial Neolithic ceramics and medieval bricks from Veliko Tarnovo city in laboratory magnetic fields of 20, 35, 50, 75, and 100 μT. The results show that for the studied samples, the magnitude of magnetic field induction determined in the Thellier–Coe experiments (archaeointensity) depends on the magnitude of the laboratory magnetic field induction in the Thellier–Coe method (which increases approximately according to a quasi-logarithmic law). It is suggested that the reason for the obtained dependence is the nonlinear dependence of the thermoremanent magnetization on the magnitude of the magnetic field (in the range of 20–100 μT) in which it was created.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Izvestiya Physics of the Solid Earth
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1069351325700685
Primary Topic
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laboratory Modeling of the Archaeomagnetic Record in Thellier–Coe Experiments

Yu.B. Tsetlin, G. V. Zhidkov, N. A. Aphinogenova, О. В. Пилипенко et al.
Izvestiya Physics of the Solid Earth
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
article

Laboratory Modeling of the Archaeomagnetic Record in Thellier–Coe Experiments

Yu.B. Tsetlin, G. V. Zhidkov, N. A. Aphinogenova, О. В. Пилипенко, G. P. Markov
article en

Abstract

Abstract—The influence of the magnitude of a laboratory magnetic field in the Thellier–Coe method on the results of determining the archaeointensity of the magnetic field was studied. The experiments were carried out on the same samples of artificial Neolithic ceramics and medieval bricks from Veliko Tarnovo city in laboratory magnetic fields of 20, 35, 50, 75, and 100 μT. The results show that for the studied samples, the magnitude of magnetic field induction determined in the Thellier–Coe experiments (archaeointensity) depends on the magnitude of the laboratory magnetic field induction in the Thellier–Coe method (which increases approximately according to a quasi-logarithmic law). It is suggested that the reason for the obtained dependence is the nonlinear dependence of the thermoremanent magnetization on the magnitude of the magnetic field (in the range of 20–100 μT) in which it was created.

Izvestiya Physics of the Solid EarthVol. 61(5)
Institute of Archaeology (RU), Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laboratory Modeling of the Archaeomagnetic Record in Thellier–Coe Experiments — Yu.B. Tsetlin, G. V. Zhidkov, et al. · Izvestiya Physics of the Solid Earth (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS