The role of social, policy and economic forces in shaping forest restoration practices in Europe

Forest restoration in Europe has a complex history strongly influenced by various social, policy and economic factors. Understanding these influences is essential for shaping effective restoration strategies and avoiding past mistakes, particularly in light of meeting ambitious targets outlined in initiatives such as the EU Nature Restoration Regulation. Here we identify the key social, policy and economic drivers, barriers and enablers that have historically shaped forest restoration across Europe. We analyzed and synthesized detailed information from historical national narratives on forest restoration provided by experts from 18 European countries. Our work details how wars, changes in governance (centralization vs. decentralization) and forest tenure (privatization vs. nationalization), different policy instruments (regulatory, financial, persuasive and organizational), market fluctuations and sociodemographic changes (e.g., rural abandonment, changes in public opinion) have driven the development of forest restoration in Europe. The findings underscore the need to use inclusive and innovative governance mechanisms to reconcile diverging societal paradigms (e.g., rural vs. urban, conservation vs. forestry) partly reflected in incoherent forest-related policies, as well as to address the fragmentation resulting from forest privatization. Ensuring stable funding mechanisms (e.g., remuneration systems for forest ecosystem services) alongside favorable regulatory frameworks will also be key for successful large-scale forest restoration efforts. Policy recommendations are made to ensure the effective implementation of the EU Nature Restoration Regulation, including a hybrid governance model that balances strong national regulatory frameworks with local adaptability to diverse socioecological contexts, integrating socioeconomic metrics, strengthening public engagement, and leveraging market-based and green tax incentives.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Land Use Policy
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107876
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of social, policy and economic forces in shaping forest restoration practices in Europe

Luc De Keersmaeker, László Gálhidy, Jurij Diaci, Jordi Palau et al.
Land Use Policy
Forest Management and Policy
article

The role of social, policy and economic forces in shaping forest restoration practices in Europe

Luc De Keersmaeker, László Gálhidy, Jurij Diaci, Jordi Palau, Marcus Lindner, Réka Aszalós, Moses Kazungu, Susanne Raum, María Menéndez‐Miguélez, Liviu Nichiforel, Palle Madsen, Marcel Hunziker, Martina Đodan, Maitane Erdozain, Vassilis Detsis, Matthias Haase, Yoan Paillet, Kris Vandekerkhove, Katharina Lapin, Jerzy Skrzyszewski, Timo Kuuluvainen, Delphine Jaymond, Metodi Sotirov, Giorgio Vacchiano, Thibault Lachat, Sander Teeuwen, Sergio de‐Miguel, Isabel Cañellas, Maciej Pach, Johan Svensson, Frank Krumm, Georgios Efthimiou, Henrik Jørgensen, Jesús García, Kurt Bollmann, Icíar Alberdi, Elisabeth Johann, Aitor Àvila Callau, Ciprian Palaghianu, J. Hoffmann, Simon Fleckenstein, Sanja Perić, Silvio Schüler, Leland Warden
article en

Abstract

Forest restoration in Europe has a complex history strongly influenced by various social, policy and economic factors. Understanding these influences is essential for shaping effective restoration strategies and avoiding past mistakes, particularly in light of meeting ambitious targets outlined in initiatives such as the EU Nature Restoration Regulation. Here we identify the key social, policy and economic drivers, barriers and enablers that have historically shaped forest restoration across Europe. We analyzed and synthesized detailed information from historical national narratives on forest restoration provided by experts from 18 European countries. Our work details how wars, changes in governance (centralization vs. decentralization) and forest tenure (privatization vs. nationalization), different policy instruments (regulatory, financial, persuasive and organizational), market fluctuations and sociodemographic changes (e.g., rural abandonment, changes in public opinion) have driven the development of forest restoration in Europe. The findings underscore the need to use inclusive and innovative governance mechanisms to reconcile diverging societal paradigms (e.g., rural vs. urban, conservation vs. forestry) partly reflected in incoherent forest-related policies, as well as to address the fragmentation resulting from forest privatization. Ensuring stable funding mechanisms (e.g., remuneration systems for forest ecosystem services) alongside favorable regulatory frameworks will also be key for successful large-scale forest restoration efforts. Policy recommendations are made to ensure the effective implementation of the EU Nature Restoration Regulation, including a hybrid governance model that balances strong national regulatory frameworks with local adaptability to diverse socioecological contexts, integrating socioeconomic metrics, strengthening public engagement, and leveraging market-based and green tax incentives.

Land Use PolicyVol. 161
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Forest Management and Policy
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.