Seed collection practices in tropical rainforest restoration and implications for provenance research

The dramatic increase in scale of ecological restoration required to meet future global targets will require enormous quantities of seed and propagule material. Tropical forests - which are often identified as priority regions for large-scale restoration - often experience substantial fragmentation and degradation, processes which may reduce the availability and genetic quality of seeds and propagules. Hence, trade-offs between cost, quantity, and genetic quality occur due to financial and logistical constraints on collection and production of plant material. Seed provenance, i.e. their ecological origin, may play a crucial role in determining the success of restoration efforts and may be directly influenced by said trade-offs. Here we examined the geographical and environmental ranges over which seeds are collected in three revegetation nurseries in tropical Australia. Our results showed that seed collections from 2012 to 2018 were overwhelmingly conducted within 10 km of the collecting nursery, concentrated in sites that were easier to access, and in areas in which the surrounding remnant forest cover was low. Additionally, seed collections were conducted predominantly in sites that were hotter than the average climate conditions surrounding the nurseries, and that – at the species level – seed collection locations frequently represented the hotter end of a species thermal range. We discuss these results in light of their effects on restoration stocks, particularly how biases in seed collection may influence the composition of species included in restoration as well as the resulting seedling genetic and phenotypic range. How such biases have affected restoration outcomes, however, remains poorly understood. • We map the seed collection locations of seedlings grown for rainforest restoration. • We then assess the geographic range and climatic conditions of these locations. • Seed is predominantly collected near nurseries and from degraded sites. • Seed collection locations are warmer on average than the surrounding landscape. • Species are predominantly collected from the warm end of their thermal range.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Ecology and Management
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123376
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seed collection practices in tropical rainforest restoration and implications for provenance research

Susan G. W. Laurance, Nara O. Vogado, Kali Middleby, Jayden E. Engert
Forest Ecology and Management
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

Seed collection practices in tropical rainforest restoration and implications for provenance research

Susan G. W. Laurance, Nara O. Vogado, Kali Middleby, Jayden E. Engert
article en

Abstract

The dramatic increase in scale of ecological restoration required to meet future global targets will require enormous quantities of seed and propagule material. Tropical forests - which are often identified as priority regions for large-scale restoration - often experience substantial fragmentation and degradation, processes which may reduce the availability and genetic quality of seeds and propagules. Hence, trade-offs between cost, quantity, and genetic quality occur due to financial and logistical constraints on collection and production of plant material. Seed provenance, i.e. their ecological origin, may play a crucial role in determining the success of restoration efforts and may be directly influenced by said trade-offs. Here we examined the geographical and environmental ranges over which seeds are collected in three revegetation nurseries in tropical Australia. Our results showed that seed collections from 2012 to 2018 were overwhelmingly conducted within 10 km of the collecting nursery, concentrated in sites that were easier to access, and in areas in which the surrounding remnant forest cover was low. Additionally, seed collections were conducted predominantly in sites that were hotter than the average climate conditions surrounding the nurseries, and that – at the species level – seed collection locations frequently represented the hotter end of a species thermal range. We discuss these results in light of their effects on restoration stocks, particularly how biases in seed collection may influence the composition of species included in restoration as well as the resulting seedling genetic and phenotypic range. How such biases have affected restoration outcomes, however, remains poorly understood. • We map the seed collection locations of seedlings grown for rainforest restoration. • We then assess the geographic range and climatic conditions of these locations. • Seed is predominantly collected near nurseries and from degraded sites. • Seed collection locations are warmer on average than the surrounding landscape. • Species are predominantly collected from the warm end of their thermal range.

Forest Ecology and ManagementVol. 602
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior (DE), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), James Cook University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.