Fear of missing out on AI: A psychological cost of technological revolution

• Newly developed English FOMO-AI scale shows strong psychometric properties. • One in nine U.S. adults report elevated FOMO-AI, especially younger adults and women. • Higher AI literacy buffers against FOMO-AI, while attitudes toward AI show no effect. • FOMO-AI predicts depressive and anxiety symptoms and reduces well-being. Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming education, healthcare, governance, and work at unprecedented speed, but such rapid development also raises new psychological and societal challenges. One emerging concern is fear of missing out on AI (FOMO-AI) – the worry that one’s AI skills or access lag behind others. This study validates an English FOMO-AI scale in a U.S. adult sample ( N = 557) and applies it to address three questions: (1) What is the prevalence and demographic distribution of FOMO-AI? (2) How do AI literacy and attitudes shape FOMO-AI? (3) Does FOMO-AI predict mental-health and well-being outcomes? Findings showed that although most people fortunately reported low FOMO-AI, a meaningful minority (more than one in nine) endorsed elevated levels, with younger adults and women being more vulnerable. Furthermore, AI literacy, but not general attitudes toward AI, emerged as the central mechanism shaping FOMO-AI, with higher literacy buffering against it and lower literacy exacerbating it. Importantly, FOMO-AI predicted greater anxiety and depressive symptoms, which, in turn, reduced well-being. Together, these results highlight FOMO-AI as a new, measurable psychological cost of technological revolution and underscore that the future of AI is not only a technological challenge but also a human one.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Telematics and Informatics Reports
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100277
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fear of missing out on AI: A psychological cost of technological revolution

Chi‐Lin Yu
1 citations
Telematics and Informatics Reports
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Fear of missing out on AI: A psychological cost of technological revolution

Chi‐Lin Yu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Newly developed English FOMO-AI scale shows strong psychometric properties. • One in nine U.S. adults report elevated FOMO-AI, especially younger adults and women. • Higher AI literacy buffers against FOMO-AI, while attitudes toward AI show no effect. • FOMO-AI predicts depressive and anxiety symptoms and reduces well-being. Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming education, healthcare, governance, and work at unprecedented speed, but such rapid development also raises new psychological and societal challenges. One emerging concern is fear of missing out on AI (FOMO-AI) – the worry that one’s AI skills or access lag behind others. This study validates an English FOMO-AI scale in a U.S. adult sample ( N = 557) and applies it to address three questions: (1) What is the prevalence and demographic distribution of FOMO-AI? (2) How do AI literacy and attitudes shape FOMO-AI? (3) Does FOMO-AI predict mental-health and well-being outcomes? Findings showed that although most people fortunately reported low FOMO-AI, a meaningful minority (more than one in nine) endorsed elevated levels, with younger adults and women being more vulnerable. Furthermore, AI literacy, but not general attitudes toward AI, emerged as the central mechanism shaping FOMO-AI, with higher literacy buffering against it and lower literacy exacerbating it. Importantly, FOMO-AI predicted greater anxiety and depressive symptoms, which, in turn, reduced well-being. Together, these results highlight FOMO-AI as a new, measurable psychological cost of technological revolution and underscore that the future of AI is not only a technological challenge but also a human one.

Telematics and Informatics ReportsVol. 20
Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.