Cognitive testing of candidate items in a wellbeing measure developed for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples

Purpose Health and wellbeing for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples is poorly understood, due to commonly used measures of quality of life and wellbeing not aligning with their collectivist worldviews. The need to develop a wellbeing measure, grounded in the aspects of life that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people identify themselves as important, was therefore a priority. The current study aimed to cognitively assess the face and content validity of a new wellbeing measure under development for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults. Methods We employed a qualitative cross-sectional cohort design. Forty-nine unique draft wellbeing statements underwent cognitive assessment using a modified Think-Aloud method we pioneered, called Think-Aloud Yarns. The statements were made into a question format, and the participants (n=17) were encouraged to verbalise their thoughts while answering the questions. This provided researchers insight into the areas where the draft statements were not performing as intended. Results and Conclusion The current study provided important insights into the cognitive validity of the WM2A wellbeing measure draft statements at a critical timepoint in the overall development of the measure. The findings from this study were synthesised and incorporated into the resultant wellbeing measure, improving the overall accuracy and robustness of the WM2A measure, and ensuring that it is truly grounded in the voices and values of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14221/2653-3219.1064
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive testing of candidate items in a wellbeing measure developed for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples

Alana Gall, Abbey Diaz, Kevin B. Anderson, Kirsten Howard et al.
Journal of the Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Cognitive testing of candidate items in a wellbeing measure developed for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples

Alana Gall, Abbey Diaz, Kevin B. Anderson, Kirsten Howard, Gail Garvey
article en

Abstract

Purpose Health and wellbeing for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples is poorly understood, due to commonly used measures of quality of life and wellbeing not aligning with their collectivist worldviews. The need to develop a wellbeing measure, grounded in the aspects of life that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people identify themselves as important, was therefore a priority. The current study aimed to cognitively assess the face and content validity of a new wellbeing measure under development for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults. Methods We employed a qualitative cross-sectional cohort design. Forty-nine unique draft wellbeing statements underwent cognitive assessment using a modified Think-Aloud method we pioneered, called Think-Aloud Yarns. The statements were made into a question format, and the participants (n=17) were encouraged to verbalise their thoughts while answering the questions. This provided researchers insight into the areas where the draft statements were not performing as intended. Results and Conclusion The current study provided important insights into the cognitive validity of the WM2A wellbeing measure draft statements at a critical timepoint in the overall development of the measure. The findings from this study were synthesised and incorporated into the resultant wellbeing measure, improving the overall accuracy and robustness of the WM2A measure, and ensuring that it is truly grounded in the voices and values of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults.

Journal of the Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNetVol. 2(3)
Menzies School of Health Research (AU)
Charles Darwin University, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.