Automated Behaviour-Driven Acceptance Testing of Robotic Systems

The specification and validation of robotics applications require bridging the gap between formulating requirements and systematic testing. This often involves manual and error-prone tasks that become more complex as requirements, design, and implementation evolve. To address this challenge systematically, we propose extending behaviour-driven development (BDD) to define and verify acceptance criteria for robotic systems. In this context, we use domain-specific modelling and represent composable BDD models as knowledge graphs for robust querying and manipulation, facilitating the generation of executable testing models. A domain-specific language helps to efficiently specify robotic acceptance criteria. We explore the potential for automated generation and execution of acceptance tests through a software architecture that integrates a BDD framework, Isaac Sim, and model transformations, focusing on acceptance criteria for pick-and-place applications. We tested this architecture with an existing pick-and-place implementation and evaluated the execution results, which shows how this application behaves and fails differently when tested against variations of the agent and environment. This research advances the rigorous and automated evaluation of robotic systems, contributing to their reliability and trustworthiness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iros60139.2025.11246121
Primary Topic
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Behaviour-Driven Acceptance Testing of Robotic Systems

Sebastian Wrede, Nico Hochgeschwender, Minh Nguyen
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
article

Automated Behaviour-Driven Acceptance Testing of Robotic Systems

Sebastian Wrede, Nico Hochgeschwender, Minh Nguyen
article en

Abstract

The specification and validation of robotics applications require bridging the gap between formulating requirements and systematic testing. This often involves manual and error-prone tasks that become more complex as requirements, design, and implementation evolve. To address this challenge systematically, we propose extending behaviour-driven development (BDD) to define and verify acceptance criteria for robotic systems. In this context, we use domain-specific modelling and represent composable BDD models as knowledge graphs for robust querying and manipulation, facilitating the generation of executable testing models. A domain-specific language helps to efficiently specify robotic acceptance criteria. We explore the potential for automated generation and execution of acceptance tests through a software architecture that integrates a BDD framework, Isaac Sim, and model transformations, focusing on acceptance criteria for pick-and-place applications. We tested this architecture with an existing pick-and-place implementation and evaluated the execution results, which shows how this application behaves and fails differently when tested against variations of the agent and environment. This research advances the rigorous and automated evaluation of robotic systems, contributing to their reliability and trustworthiness.

Hochschule Bremen (DE), University of Bremen (DE), Bielefeld University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Automated Behaviour-Driven Acceptance Testing of Robotic Systems — Sebastian Wrede, Nico Hochgeschwender, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS