Is Non-Papillary Puncture in Ultrasound-Guided Standard-Access Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Safe and Feasible for Complex Renal Stones?

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To investigate the safety and feasibility of non-papillary puncture in total ultrasound (US)-guided standard size access percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for patients with complex renal stones. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively reviewed the charts of complex renal stones (Guy's scoring system 3-4) patients who had undergone standard size access PCNL in our department from January 2019 to October 2023 (<i>n</i> = 422). Renal abnormalities, history of PCNL and pyelolithotomy/nephrolithotomy, and multiple tracts PCNL were excluded. Two hundred A total of 218 eligible patients were finally enrolled. These patients were allocated to two groups according to puncture site: papillary (Group 1, <i>n</i> = 182) and non-papillary (Group 2, <i>n</i> = 36). All procedures were guided by total US. Single standard access (22-24 F) was achieved in all patients. Relevant patient characteristics, operative variables, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed, with a focus on the stone-free rate (SFR) and bleeding complications. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Successful percutaneous renal puncture was achieved in all patients. Patients' basic characteristics (gender, age, body mass index, stone size, surgical side) were similar between the two groups. The SFRs in the papillary puncture group were significantly higher than the non-papillary puncture group (81.3% <i>vs</i> 69.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Hemoglobin loss in Group 2 is much more significant than in Group 1 (18.4 ± 5.4 g/L <i>vs</i> 10.4 ± 4.7 g/L, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Overall non-severe complication (Clavien-Dindo Grade 1-2) rates were significantly lower in Group 1 (<i>p</i> = 0.02, 0.03). The operative duration, transfusion rate, severe complication rate, and renal function changes show no significant difference between the two groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> US-guided PCNL through a standard-access tract is necessary for renal papilla puncture. Non-papillary puncture increases bleeding volume and reduces SFR, and should be avoided in complex stones whenever possible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endourology
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251403556
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Non-Papillary Puncture in Ultrasound-Guided Standard-Access Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Safe and Feasible for Complex Renal Stones?

Yangyang Xu, Zhichao Luo, Wenjie Bai, Bo Xiao et al.
Journal of Endourology
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Is Non-Papillary Puncture in Ultrasound-Guided Standard-Access Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Safe and Feasible for Complex Renal Stones?

Yangyang Xu, Zhichao Luo, Wenjie Bai, Bo Xiao, Haiwen Huang, Jianxing Li, Xue Zeng, Sen Lin, Yang Chen
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To investigate the safety and feasibility of non-papillary puncture in total ultrasound (US)-guided standard size access percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for patients with complex renal stones. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively reviewed the charts of complex renal stones (Guy's scoring system 3-4) patients who had undergone standard size access PCNL in our department from January 2019 to October 2023 (<i>n</i> = 422). Renal abnormalities, history of PCNL and pyelolithotomy/nephrolithotomy, and multiple tracts PCNL were excluded. Two hundred A total of 218 eligible patients were finally enrolled. These patients were allocated to two groups according to puncture site: papillary (Group 1, <i>n</i> = 182) and non-papillary (Group 2, <i>n</i> = 36). All procedures were guided by total US. Single standard access (22-24 F) was achieved in all patients. Relevant patient characteristics, operative variables, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed, with a focus on the stone-free rate (SFR) and bleeding complications. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Successful percutaneous renal puncture was achieved in all patients. Patients' basic characteristics (gender, age, body mass index, stone size, surgical side) were similar between the two groups. The SFRs in the papillary puncture group were significantly higher than the non-papillary puncture group (81.3% <i>vs</i> 69.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Hemoglobin loss in Group 2 is much more significant than in Group 1 (18.4 ± 5.4 g/L <i>vs</i> 10.4 ± 4.7 g/L, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Overall non-severe complication (Clavien-Dindo Grade 1-2) rates were significantly lower in Group 1 (<i>p</i> = 0.02, 0.03). The operative duration, transfusion rate, severe complication rate, and renal function changes show no significant difference between the two groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> US-guided PCNL through a standard-access tract is necessary for renal papilla puncture. Non-papillary puncture increases bleeding volume and reduces SFR, and should be avoided in complex stones whenever possible.

Journal of EndourologyVol. 39(12)
Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.