Arrested (Oversight) Development: Civilian Oversight, Law Enforcement, and Federalism

Local governments have faced repeated calls for law enforcement reform, with advocates promoting civilian oversight agencies to improve accountability. These efforts tend to target municipal police departments, leaving county sheriffs’ offices often overlooked, despite their important roles in the carceral system. However, two states stand out as exceptional: state legislatures in Maryland and California passed new laws to promote county efforts for civilian oversight of sheriffs. Which county governments create or strengthen boards in response to this window of opportunity, and how does this process compare to the creation of municipal boards? We argue that voter demographics, rather than police violence and protests, play a more significant role in influencing the adoption of civilian oversight of sheriffs, who are elected officials. Drawing on an original dataset of oversight board formation, we show that counties create or strengthen boards when there is political support from the local electorate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Affairs Review
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874251393671
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Arrested (Oversight) Development: Civilian Oversight, Law Enforcement, and Federalism

Mirya R. Holman, Emily M. Farris
Urban Affairs Review
Policing Practices and Perceptions
article

Arrested (Oversight) Development: Civilian Oversight, Law Enforcement, and Federalism

Mirya R. Holman, Emily M. Farris
article en

Abstract

Local governments have faced repeated calls for law enforcement reform, with advocates promoting civilian oversight agencies to improve accountability. These efforts tend to target municipal police departments, leaving county sheriffs’ offices often overlooked, despite their important roles in the carceral system. However, two states stand out as exceptional: state legislatures in Maryland and California passed new laws to promote county efforts for civilian oversight of sheriffs. Which county governments create or strengthen boards in response to this window of opportunity, and how does this process compare to the creation of municipal boards? We argue that voter demographics, rather than police violence and protests, play a more significant role in influencing the adoption of civilian oversight of sheriffs, who are elected officials. Drawing on an original dataset of oversight board formation, we show that counties create or strengthen boards when there is political support from the local electorate.

Urban Affairs Review
Texas Christian University (US), University of Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.