AI-Augmented Fundus Disease Screening by Non-Ophthalmologist Physicians: A Paired Before–After Study

Screening for retinal disease is increasingly performed by general practitioners and other non-ophthalmologist clinicians in primary care, especially where access to ophthalmology is limited and diagnostic accuracy may be suboptimal. To investigate the role of an automated fundus-interpretation support solution in improving general physicians' screening accuracy and referral decisions, we conducted a paired before-after study evaluating an AI-based decision support tool. Four non-ophthalmologists who have been involved in screen fundus images in clinical practice reviewed 500 de-identified color fundus photographs twice-first unaided and, after a washout period, with AI assistance. With AI support, diagnostic accuracy improved significantly from 82.8% to 91.1% (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), with the greatest benefit observed in glaucoma-suspect and multi-pathology cases. Clinicians retained final diagnostic authority, and a favorable safety profile was observed. These results demonstrate that AI-assisted diagnosis aid can meaningfully augment non-ophthalmologist screening and referral decision-making in real-world primary care, while underscoring the need for broader validation and implementation studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12121304
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Augmented Fundus Disease Screening by Non-Ophthalmologist Physicians: A Paired Before–After Study

EunAh Kim, Su Jeong Song
Bioengineering
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

AI-Augmented Fundus Disease Screening by Non-Ophthalmologist Physicians: A Paired Before–After Study

EunAh Kim, Su Jeong Song
article en

Abstract

Screening for retinal disease is increasingly performed by general practitioners and other non-ophthalmologist clinicians in primary care, especially where access to ophthalmology is limited and diagnostic accuracy may be suboptimal. To investigate the role of an automated fundus-interpretation support solution in improving general physicians' screening accuracy and referral decisions, we conducted a paired before-after study evaluating an AI-based decision support tool. Four non-ophthalmologists who have been involved in screen fundus images in clinical practice reviewed 500 de-identified color fundus photographs twice-first unaided and, after a washout period, with AI assistance. With AI support, diagnostic accuracy improved significantly from 82.8% to 91.1% (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), with the greatest benefit observed in glaucoma-suspect and multi-pathology cases. Clinicians retained final diagnostic authority, and a favorable safety profile was observed. These results demonstrate that AI-assisted diagnosis aid can meaningfully augment non-ophthalmologist screening and referral decision-making in real-world primary care, while underscoring the need for broader validation and implementation studies.

BioengineeringVol. 12(12)
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.