Global state of knowledge on human-induced sound and vibration events: defining future research directions for mass timber products

Abstract Despite the rise in mass timber buildings globally, challenges remain with timber’s limitations in low-frequency sound and vibration. This is due to timber’s lower density compared to concrete and steel, leading to natural frequencies more susceptible to disturbances from footfall vibrations. This study identifies areas for further research in floor sound and vibration through a combined analysis of practitioner consultations and systematic review. A total of 112 discussions across 13 countries captured varying perspectives from producers of mass timber products through to designers of mass timber structures, as well as researchers of these different approaches. Of those consulted, 75% of producers noted increased mass timber product demand alongside a need for more design data, with 61% of designers and builders facing challenges related to sound and vibration. In addition, 17% of builders reported receiving tenant complaints over sound and vibration-related concerns, with 44% of practitioners noting concerns over sound and vibration performance. Several standards/design guides were analysed and ranked through the systematic review and practitioner consultation finding FprEN 1995-1-1, CCIP-016, and BS 6472-1 to be highly ranked from both analysis approaches. However, there were several cases, where standards ranked highly through the literature analysis approach were not highly ranked through the analysis of practitioner responses. Three under-researched areas were identified: (1) long-span floor systems, (2) the influence of mass timber product material properties, and (3) the undefined relationship between lab and in-situ performance. Furthermore, 71% of practitioners highlighted that the perception of comfort by occupants is under-represented in current research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wood Science
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10086-025-02247-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wood Treatment and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global state of knowledge on human-induced sound and vibration events: defining future research directions for mass timber products

Hassan Karampour, Aleksandar Pavić, Adam Faircloth, Stefan Schoenwald et al.
1 citations
Journal of Wood Science
Wood Treatment and Properties
1.01
article

Global state of knowledge on human-induced sound and vibration events: defining future research directions for mass timber products

Hassan Karampour, Aleksandar Pavić, Adam Faircloth, Stefan Schoenwald, Haoyu Huang, Loïc Brancheriau, Theresa Müller, Benoit P. Gilbert, Chandan Kumar, Patricia Hamm, Johannes Ruf, Paul Reynolds, Phillipe Gronquist
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Despite the rise in mass timber buildings globally, challenges remain with timber’s limitations in low-frequency sound and vibration. This is due to timber’s lower density compared to concrete and steel, leading to natural frequencies more susceptible to disturbances from footfall vibrations. This study identifies areas for further research in floor sound and vibration through a combined analysis of practitioner consultations and systematic review. A total of 112 discussions across 13 countries captured varying perspectives from producers of mass timber products through to designers of mass timber structures, as well as researchers of these different approaches. Of those consulted, 75% of producers noted increased mass timber product demand alongside a need for more design data, with 61% of designers and builders facing challenges related to sound and vibration. In addition, 17% of builders reported receiving tenant complaints over sound and vibration-related concerns, with 44% of practitioners noting concerns over sound and vibration performance. Several standards/design guides were analysed and ranked through the systematic review and practitioner consultation finding FprEN 1995-1-1, CCIP-016, and BS 6472-1 to be highly ranked from both analysis approaches. However, there were several cases, where standards ranked highly through the literature analysis approach were not highly ranked through the analysis of practitioner responses. Three under-researched areas were identified: (1) long-span floor systems, (2) the influence of mass timber product material properties, and (3) the undefined relationship between lab and in-situ performance. Furthermore, 71% of practitioners highlighted that the perception of comfort by occupants is under-represented in current research.

Journal of Wood ScienceVol. 71(1)
University of Stuttgart (DE), Griffith University (AU), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), University of Applied Sciences Biberach (DE), University of Exeter (GB), New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU), Gouvernance, Risque, Environnement, Développement (FR), Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (AU), Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (CH), Newcastle University (GB), Salisbury University (US)
Griffith University
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Wood Treatment and Properties
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.