Time prediction methods in production − a scoping review of the 21st century so far

• Review of methods for predicting job and manufacturing activity durations. • Analysis of 173 papers between 2000–2024. • Analysis of production times, features, prediction methods and prediction error. • State-of-the-art approaches, prediction methods and research designs are discussed. • Research gaps and future research directions are provided. Accurate prediction of production times is a key aspect of industrial engineering, as it directly affects production planning, product cost estimation, and continuous improvement management. In modern society, where customer expectations for low cost, short lead times, and high quality are constantly rising, inaccurate time estimation can lead to poor decision-making, customer dissatisfaction, and loss of market position. Dynamic changes in demand, supply, and product variety, as well as variations in worker skills, machine conditions, and manufacturing system states, make time prediction increasingly important and challenging, despite the growing availability of data. This scoping review of 173 papers published between 2000 and 2024 examines the state of the art in production time prediction and outlines directions for future research. The studies are classified by the type of predicted time, applied methods, manufacturing systems, and reported accuracy. This classification highlights patterns in the use of different prediction methods and provides insight into their respective performance. The analysis finds that machine learning methods are increasingly used for lead time prediction (approx. 10% error) and human-centred activities (approx. 20% error), while deterministic approaches remain relevant for machining operations (approx. 6% error). Despite the long history of production time prediction and several established practices, gaps remain in methodological standards, including inconsistent definitions of production times, varying validation metrics and procedures, and limited attention to data credibility and system integration. Research on practical applications outside highly automated sectors, such as semiconductor or automotive manufacturing, is also limited, particularly for human-centric tasks expected to grow, including maintenance and collaborative robotics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2025.111713
Primary Topic
Assembly Line Balancing Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time prediction methods in production − a scoping review of the 21st century so far

František Koblasa, Maria Urban
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Assembly Line Balancing Optimization
article

Time prediction methods in production − a scoping review of the 21st century so far

František Koblasa, Maria Urban
article en

Abstract

• Review of methods for predicting job and manufacturing activity durations. • Analysis of 173 papers between 2000–2024. • Analysis of production times, features, prediction methods and prediction error. • State-of-the-art approaches, prediction methods and research designs are discussed. • Research gaps and future research directions are provided. Accurate prediction of production times is a key aspect of industrial engineering, as it directly affects production planning, product cost estimation, and continuous improvement management. In modern society, where customer expectations for low cost, short lead times, and high quality are constantly rising, inaccurate time estimation can lead to poor decision-making, customer dissatisfaction, and loss of market position. Dynamic changes in demand, supply, and product variety, as well as variations in worker skills, machine conditions, and manufacturing system states, make time prediction increasingly important and challenging, despite the growing availability of data. This scoping review of 173 papers published between 2000 and 2024 examines the state of the art in production time prediction and outlines directions for future research. The studies are classified by the type of predicted time, applied methods, manufacturing systems, and reported accuracy. This classification highlights patterns in the use of different prediction methods and provides insight into their respective performance. The analysis finds that machine learning methods are increasingly used for lead time prediction (approx. 10% error) and human-centred activities (approx. 20% error), while deterministic approaches remain relevant for machining operations (approx. 6% error). Despite the long history of production time prediction and several established practices, gaps remain in methodological standards, including inconsistent definitions of production times, varying validation metrics and procedures, and limited attention to data credibility and system integration. Research on practical applications outside highly automated sectors, such as semiconductor or automotive manufacturing, is also limited, particularly for human-centric tasks expected to grow, including maintenance and collaborative robotics.

Computers & Industrial EngineeringVol. 213
Technical University of Liberec (CZ), Zittau/Görlitz University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Assembly Line Balancing Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.