Comparison of remote to hybrid methods on recruitment and retention rates in a smoking cessation trial
This study suggests that remote methods may be as effective as in-person methods in a clinical trial, although a randomized trial of these methods is needed.
Authors
- Peter S. Hendricks (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8642-9584)
- Andrew Bontemps (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1902-3045)
- Adrienne C. Lahti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5565-7662)
- Karen L. Cropsey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6921-3440)
- Andrés Azuero (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9883-1424)
- William P. Wagner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8794-8835)
- Elizabeth Hawes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1454-4597)
Institutions
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Published
- 2025-11-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112976
- Primary Topic
- Ethics in Clinical Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00