Evaluating the Accuracy of Large Language Models in Pharmaceutical Calculations: A Comparison of ChatGPT and MathGPT

While demonstrating some capability, the 70% accuracy of ChatGPT 3.5 and MathGPT Unlimited, coupled with fundamental calculation errors, indicates they are insufficiently accurate for sole use in pharmaceutical calculations. These findings highlight the imperative for pharmacy educators to emphasize foundational skills and teach critical evaluation of artificial intelligence-generated responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101910
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Accuracy of Large Language Models in Pharmaceutical Calculations: A Comparison of ChatGPT and MathGPT

Chenxiang Zhang, Bernadette Cornelison, A. Middleton, Brian L. Erstad et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Evaluating the Accuracy of Large Language Models in Pharmaceutical Calculations: A Comparison of ChatGPT and MathGPT

Chenxiang Zhang, Bernadette Cornelison, A. Middleton, Brian L. Erstad, Christopher J. Edwards, Jon Ove Hagen, Julia Halloran
article en
1 citations

Abstract

While demonstrating some capability, the 70% accuracy of ChatGPT 3.5 and MathGPT Unlimited, coupled with fundamental calculation errors, indicates they are insufficiently accurate for sole use in pharmaceutical calculations. These findings highlight the imperative for pharmacy educators to emphasize foundational skills and teach critical evaluation of artificial intelligence-generated responses.

American Journal of Pharmaceutical EducationVol. 90(1)
University of Arizona (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.