Investigation of the pull-off forces for implant-supported overdentures with two resilient attachment systems

Here we evaluated the retention of two implant-supported overdenture attachment systems - Locator and CM-LOC - on edentulous mandibular models. We compared the retention force between these systems based on implant number and position, addressing complications like loss of retention and ease of denture removal. Implants were placed in various configurations (two, three or four implants) and two attachment systems were tested using different retention inserts. Locator system generally provided higher pull-off forces than the CM-LOC system, especially with the red and transparent inserts. However, the CM-LOC system showed less complications, such as loss of retention element. In terms of axial and non-axial pull-off tests, Locator system performed better than the CM-LOC system, particularly in the non-axial direction, which closely reflects real-life conditions. The results showed that implant angulation and choice of attachment system were critical factors influencing resulting retention forces. Overall, the study concluded that while the Locator system achieved high retention forces, the CM-LOC system had less complications and might be a better option for patients with difficulties in denture removal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2025.152755
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of the pull-off forces for implant-supported overdentures with two resilient attachment systems

Christoph Peter Bourauel, Istabrak Dörsam, Anna Weber, Nicole Gumprecht
Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Investigation of the pull-off forces for implant-supported overdentures with two resilient attachment systems

Christoph Peter Bourauel, Istabrak Dörsam, Anna Weber, Nicole Gumprecht
article en

Abstract

Here we evaluated the retention of two implant-supported overdenture attachment systems - Locator and CM-LOC - on edentulous mandibular models. We compared the retention force between these systems based on implant number and position, addressing complications like loss of retention and ease of denture removal. Implants were placed in various configurations (two, three or four implants) and two attachment systems were tested using different retention inserts. Locator system generally provided higher pull-off forces than the CM-LOC system, especially with the red and transparent inserts. However, the CM-LOC system showed less complications, such as loss of retention element. In terms of axial and non-axial pull-off tests, Locator system performed better than the CM-LOC system, particularly in the non-axial direction, which closely reflects real-life conditions. The results showed that implant angulation and choice of attachment system were critical factors influencing resulting retention forces. Overall, the study concluded that while the Locator system achieved high retention forces, the CM-LOC system had less complications and might be a better option for patients with difficulties in denture removal.

Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer AnzeigerVol. 264
University of Bonn (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.