Air gap effects on dimensional accuracy in multi-material X-ray CT measurements

• Air gaps cause significant XCT measurement errors in multi-material assemblies • Multi-material setups reduce XCT accuracy even without air gaps between surfaces. • POM shafts show up to 0.4 mm error due to aluminium surroundings and air gaps • Smaller voxel sizes improve CT accuracy and reduce variability • Residual errors in multi-material XCT scans are up to 8 × higher than in single-material mode. Accurate dimensional measurement using X-ray computed tomography (XCT) is essential in quality control, especially for parts made of multiple materials. This study investigates how small air gaps between aluminium and polyoxymethylene (POM) components affect measurement accuracy in XCT scans. Using a full factorial experimental design, eight XCT scanning settings were tested, varying voxel size, binning/exposure time, and rotation mode. Measurements were compared to reference values from a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) across seven shaft segments with different air gap sizes from 25 μ m to 250 μ m. The results show that air gaps significantly increase measurement errors, in metal-polymer configuration. POM shafts showed measurement errors up to 0.4 mm, while aluminium bores had measurement errors up to 0.15 mm. Voxel size emerged as a critical factor: smaller voxel sizes (68.4 μ m) consistently yielded lower errors and reduced variability. Residual errors increased substantially in multi-material mode, reaching up to eight times those in single-material scans, especially for POM shafts. Importantly, even when no air gaps were present between surfaces, multi-material configurations still reduced XCT precision. The best achievable measurement errors were approximately 6 μ m for aluminium bores and 11 μ m for POM samples in single-material mode, increasing to 20 μ m and 50 μ m respectively in multi-material mode. These findings underscore the need for optimized XCT settings and material-aware calibration standards to ensure reliable metrology in multi-material assemblies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108408
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Air gap effects on dimensional accuracy in multi-material X-ray CT measurements

Attila Marczis, Ágota Drégelyi-Kiss
1 citations
Results in Engineering
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
0.67
article

Air gap effects on dimensional accuracy in multi-material X-ray CT measurements

Attila Marczis, Ágota Drégelyi-Kiss
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Air gaps cause significant XCT measurement errors in multi-material assemblies • Multi-material setups reduce XCT accuracy even without air gaps between surfaces. • POM shafts show up to 0.4 mm error due to aluminium surroundings and air gaps • Smaller voxel sizes improve CT accuracy and reduce variability • Residual errors in multi-material XCT scans are up to 8 × higher than in single-material mode. Accurate dimensional measurement using X-ray computed tomography (XCT) is essential in quality control, especially for parts made of multiple materials. This study investigates how small air gaps between aluminium and polyoxymethylene (POM) components affect measurement accuracy in XCT scans. Using a full factorial experimental design, eight XCT scanning settings were tested, varying voxel size, binning/exposure time, and rotation mode. Measurements were compared to reference values from a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) across seven shaft segments with different air gap sizes from 25 μ m to 250 μ m. The results show that air gaps significantly increase measurement errors, in metal-polymer configuration. POM shafts showed measurement errors up to 0.4 mm, while aluminium bores had measurement errors up to 0.15 mm. Voxel size emerged as a critical factor: smaller voxel sizes (68.4 μ m) consistently yielded lower errors and reduced variability. Residual errors increased substantially in multi-material mode, reaching up to eight times those in single-material scans, especially for POM shafts. Importantly, even when no air gaps were present between surfaces, multi-material configurations still reduced XCT precision. The best achievable measurement errors were approximately 6 μ m for aluminium bores and 11 μ m for POM samples in single-material mode, increasing to 20 μ m and 50 μ m respectively in multi-material mode. These findings underscore the need for optimized XCT settings and material-aware calibration standards to ensure reliable metrology in multi-material assemblies.

Results in EngineeringVol. 28
Obuda University (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.