Word reading and pain: does short-lasting pain affect phonological decoding?

Some cognitive functions are impaired when experiencing pain, but the influence of pain on word reading accuracy and fluency has not been investigated before. The aim of this study was to explore how word reading as a controlled process (phonological decoding) was influenced by experimental pain. Pain-free participants (n = 176) were assigned to two different experimental groups, pain-induction (n =73) and no pain induction (n = 73). Participants performed the phonological choice task with their left hand immersed in a cold water-bath (pain induced group) or with their left hand immersed in a tepid water-bath (no pain group). The results were largely consistent with the null hypothesis because no significant difference between the pain-induced and the no pain group was revealed. A weak significant correlation between estimated pain intensity and the performance of the phonological choice task, as well as between estimated pain-related negative affect and the performance of the phonological choice task was found. Experimental pain is different from clinical pain. Therefore, the relationship between clinical pain and phonological decoding should be investigated in future studies. Drawing more heavily on controlled processes, the effect of pain on phonological decoding in less proficient readers should also be examined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Psychology
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2025.2591487
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Word reading and pain: does short-lasting pain affect phonological decoding?

Helena Gunnarsson, Christian Waldmann
Cogent Psychology
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Word reading and pain: does short-lasting pain affect phonological decoding?

Helena Gunnarsson, Christian Waldmann
article en

Abstract

Some cognitive functions are impaired when experiencing pain, but the influence of pain on word reading accuracy and fluency has not been investigated before. The aim of this study was to explore how word reading as a controlled process (phonological decoding) was influenced by experimental pain. Pain-free participants (n = 176) were assigned to two different experimental groups, pain-induction (n =73) and no pain induction (n = 73). Participants performed the phonological choice task with their left hand immersed in a cold water-bath (pain induced group) or with their left hand immersed in a tepid water-bath (no pain group). The results were largely consistent with the null hypothesis because no significant difference between the pain-induced and the no pain group was revealed. A weak significant correlation between estimated pain intensity and the performance of the phonological choice task, as well as between estimated pain-related negative affect and the performance of the phonological choice task was found. Experimental pain is different from clinical pain. Therefore, the relationship between clinical pain and phonological decoding should be investigated in future studies. Drawing more heavily on controlled processes, the effect of pain on phonological decoding in less proficient readers should also be examined.

Cogent PsychologyVol. 12(1)
Linnaeus University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.